Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package rubygem-webyast-ldap for 
openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2012-11-29 09:29:49
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rubygem-webyast-ldap (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rubygem-webyast-ldap.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "rubygem-webyast-ldap", Maintainer is "[email protected]"

Changes:
--------
--- 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rubygem-webyast-ldap/rubygem-webyast-ldap.changes    
    2012-11-08 21:53:24.000000000 +0100
+++ 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rubygem-webyast-ldap.new/rubygem-webyast-ldap.changes
   2012-11-29 09:29:52.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,6 @@
+Mon Nov 19 10:24:18 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- added missing *-32bit package dependencies (bnc#789768)
+- 0.3.8
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  webyast-ldap-0.3.7.gem

New:
----
  webyast-ldap-0.3.8.gem

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ rubygem-webyast-ldap.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.mUhCJc/_old  2012-11-29 09:29:53.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.mUhCJc/_new  2012-11-29 09:29:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 
 Name:           rubygem-webyast-ldap
-Version:        0.3.7
+Version:        0.3.8
 Release:        0
 %define mod_name webyast-ldap
 %define mod_full_name %{mod_name}-%{version}
@@ -48,6 +48,17 @@
 Requires:       nss_ldap
 Requires:       pam_ldap
 Requires:       yast2-ldap-client
+
+# require 32bit packages (bnc#789768)
+%ifarch ppc64 s390x x86_64
+Requires:       nss_ldap-32bit
+Requires:       pam_ldap-32bit
+%endif
+%ifarch ia64
+Requires:       nss_ldap-x86
+Requires:       pam_ldap-x86
+%endif
+
 # reasonable PATH set (bnc#617442) 
 Requires:       yast2-dbus-server >= 2.17.3
 


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to