Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package rcs for openSUSE:Factory checked in 
at 2012-12-20 11:09:17
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rcs (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rcs.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "rcs", Maintainer is "[email protected]"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/rcs/rcs.changes  2012-07-24 17:20:32.000000000 
+0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.rcs.new/rcs.changes     2012-12-20 
11:09:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,6 @@
+Mon Dec 17 12:53:47 UTC 2012 - [email protected]
+
+- rcs-rlog-zLT.patch
+  * fix output of "rlog -zLT" on x86_64 (bnc#784948) 
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

New:
----
  rcs-rlog-zLT.patch

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ rcs.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.jAHSJn/_old  2012-12-20 11:09:19.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.jAHSJn/_new  2012-12-20 11:09:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 Group:          Development/Tools/Version Control
 Source:         ftp://ftp.cs.purdue.edu/pub/RCS/rcs-%version.tar.gz
 Patch1:         rcs-stdio.in.patch
+Patch2:         rcs-rlog-zLT.patch
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
 
 %description
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@
 %prep
 %setup
 %patch1 -p1
+%patch2 -p0
 
 %build
 ac_cv_path_SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail \

++++++ rcs-rlog-zLT.patch ++++++
Source: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-rcs/2011-11/msg00000.html

rlog -zLT sometimes displays wrong date
From:     Oliver Billmann
Subject:  rlog -zLT sometimes displays wrong date
Date:     Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:39:43 +0100

Hi,

I stumbled over a strange behaviour with rlog from the current 5.8 version.

Calling "rlog -zLT '-d>2011-05-04' RCS/user.sql,v" with user.sql,v
containing

    1.13
    date    2011.09.30.15.39.03;    author oliver;  state Exp;
    branches;
    next    1.12;


displays the following:

on a Gentoo Linux i686 machine:

    revision 1.13
    date: 2011-09-30 17:39:03+02;  author: oliver;  state: Exp;  lines: +4 -4
    Neue Spalte SessionFlag belegen...


on a Gentoo Linux x86_64 machine:

    revision 1.13
    date: 2011-01-01 16:39:03+01;  author: oliver;  state: Exp;  lines: +4 -4
    Neue Spalte SessionFlag belegen...


Note the incorrect date.

After some debugging it looks like a variable not being initialized
correctly: t.tm_yday in rcstime.c:date2str is not set but will be used
in tm2time if TM_LOCAL_ZONE is requested. On the i686 machine it was
"initialized" with some large negative number which will than lead to
tm_yday being initialized in tm2time. But on the x86_64 machine it
contained the valid value 0 which than always leads to YYYY-01-01 ...

The following patch should fix it:

--- src/rcstime.c.orig  2012-12-17 14:05:27.000000000 +0100
+++ src/rcstime.c       2012-12-17 14:05:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ date2str (char const date[datesize], cha
       MORE (tm_min);
       MORE (tm_sec);
       t.tm_wday = -1;
+      t.tm_yday = -1;
 #undef MORE
 
       zone = BE (zone_offset.seconds);
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to