Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package python-coverage for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2013-10-21 20:01:20
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-coverage (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-coverage.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "python-coverage"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-coverage/python-coverage.changes  
2013-05-16 16:15:41.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-coverage.new/python-coverage.changes     
2013-10-21 20:01:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,12 @@
+Mon Oct 21 12:17:02 UTC 2013 - [email protected]
+
+- update to 3.7:
+   * Added the ``--debug`` switch to ``coverage run``.  It accepts a list of
+   options indicating the type of internal activity to log to stderr.
+   * Running code with ``coverage run -m`` now behaves more like Python does,
+   setting sys.path properly, which fixes `issue 207`_ and `issue 242`_.
+   * Coverage can now run .pyc files directly, closing `issue 264`_.
+
+   Over 15 other bugfixes, see included CHANGELOG
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  coverage-3.6.tar.gz

New:
----
  coverage-3.7.tar.gz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ python-coverage.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.tR3rkr/_old  2013-10-21 20:01:23.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.tR3rkr/_new  2013-10-21 20:01:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 
 Name:           python-coverage
-Version:        3.6
+Version:        3.7
 Release:        0
 Url:            http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/%{version}
 Summary:        Code coverage measurement for Python

++++++ coverage-3.6.tar.gz -> coverage-3.7.tar.gz ++++++
++++ 36148 lines of diff (skipped)

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to