Hello community, here is the log from the commit of package tar for openSUSE:Factory checked in at 2014-08-01 11:48:27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/tar (Old) and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.tar.new (New) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "tar" Changes: -------- --- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/tar/tar.changes 2014-04-06 09:54:01.000000000 +0200 +++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.tar.new/tar.changes 2014-08-01 11:48:30.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,0 +2,9 @@ +Mon Jul 28 20:01:53 UTC 2014 - [email protected] + +- don't print lone zero blocks warning (bnc#881863) + * there are many tar implementations around that create invalid + archives with a zero block in the middle + * https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=235820 + * added tar-ignore_lone_zero_blocks.patch from Fedora + +------------------------------------------------------------------- New: ---- tar-ignore_lone_zero_blocks.patch ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Other differences: ------------------ ++++++ tar.spec ++++++ --- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.L72Pke/_old 2014-08-01 11:48:31.000000000 +0200 +++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.L72Pke/_new 2014-08-01 11:48:31.000000000 +0200 @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@ Patch7: tar-1.26-remove_O_NONBLOCK.patch Patch8: tar-fix_eternal_loop_in_handle_option.patch Patch10: paxutils-rtapelib_mtget.patch +# don't print warning about zero blocks +# the patch is used in Fedora and Debian +# https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=235820 +Patch11: tar-ignore_lone_zero_blocks.patch Patch20: add_readme-tests.patch %if 0%{?suse_version} >= %min_suse_ver BuildRequires: help2man @@ -80,6 +84,7 @@ %patch7 -p1 %patch8 -p1 %patch10 -p1 +%patch11 -p1 %patch20 -p1 %build ++++++ tar-ignore_lone_zero_blocks.patch ++++++ Index: tar-1.26/src/list.c =================================================================== --- tar-1.26.orig/src/list.c 2011-02-16 23:12:16.000000000 +0100 +++ tar-1.26/src/list.c 2014-06-11 11:48:38.129824435 +0200 @@ -212,6 +212,14 @@ read_and (void (*do_something) (void)) if (!ignore_zeros_option) { + /* + * According to POSIX tar specs, this is wrong, but on the web + * there are some tar specs that can trigger this, and some tar + * implementations create tars according to that spec. For now, + * let's not be pedantic about issuing the warning. + */ +#if 0 + char buf[UINTMAX_STRSIZE_BOUND]; status = read_header (¤t_header, ¤t_stat_info, @@ -221,6 +229,9 @@ read_and (void (*do_something) (void)) WARNOPT (WARN_ALONE_ZERO_BLOCK, (0, 0, _("A lone zero block at %s"), STRINGIFY_BIGINT (current_block_ordinal (), buf))); +#endif + status = read_header (¤t_header, ¤t_stat_info, + read_header_auto); break; } status = prev_status; -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
