Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package dateutils for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2015-03-09 10:09:23
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/dateutils (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.dateutils.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "dateutils"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/dateutils/dateutils.changes      2015-01-22 
00:50:42.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.dateutils.new/dateutils.changes 2015-03-09 
10:09:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,14 @@
+Thu Mar  5 16:25:37 UTC 2015 - [email protected]
+
+- bump version 0.3.2, this is a bugfix release.
+  * Bugfixes:
+    - out of range minutes will be discarded
+    - bug 30 (malicious input crashes dconv) has been fixed
+  * Features:
+    - military midnight stamps are supported (T24:00:00)
+    - 8601 ordinal dates (year + doy) are recognised directly
+      (`-f yd`)
+    - strptime(1) can behave in a locale-dependent way
+  * See info page examples and/or README.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  dateutils-0.3.1.tar.xz

New:
----
  dateutils-0.3.2.tar.xz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ dateutils.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.LQ6SBU/_old  2015-03-09 10:09:36.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.LQ6SBU/_new  2015-03-09 10:09:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 #
 
 
-%define xversion 0.3.1
+%define xversion 0.3.2
 
 %define have_octave 0
 
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 %endif
 
 Name:           dateutils
-Version:        0.3.1
+Version:        0.3.2
 Release:        0
 Summary:        Nifty command line date and time utilities
 License:        BSD-3-Clause

++++++ dateutils-0.3.1.tar.xz -> dateutils-0.3.2.tar.xz ++++++
++++ 12447 lines of diff (skipped)

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to