Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package goffice for openSUSE:Factory checked 
in at 2015-03-11 09:58:11
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/goffice (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.goffice.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "goffice"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/goffice/goffice.changes  2015-02-06 
10:22:48.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.goffice.new/goffice.changes     2015-03-11 
09:58:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,17 @@
+Thu Mar  5 09:08:38 UTC 2015 - [email protected]
+
+- Update to version 0.10.21:
+  + Ignore invalid values while checking data order (bgo#744200).
+  + Ensure that GOPixbuf keeps the original data around
+    (bgo#745297).
+  + Fix sheet objects rendering, including widgets (bgo#744076).
+  + Fix problem with linear solver.
+  + Add arrow selector widget.
+  + Fix rendering of dotted lines (bgo#744419).
+  + Activate font part of graph theming.
+  + Plug leaks.
+  + Add tooltips to gradient selector.
+  + Add tooltips to pattern selector.
+  + GOImage fixes.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  goffice-0.10.20.tar.xz

New:
----
  goffice-0.10.21.tar.xz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ goffice.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.iLS5Yl/_old  2015-03-11 09:58:12.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.iLS5Yl/_new  2015-03-11 09:58:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 
 Name:           goffice
-Version:        0.10.20
+Version:        0.10.21
 Release:        0
 Summary:        GLib/GTK+ Set of Document-Centric Objects and Utilities
 License:        GPL-2.0 or GPL-3.0

++++++ goffice-0.10.20.tar.xz -> goffice-0.10.21.tar.xz ++++++
++++ 6200 lines of diff (skipped)

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to