Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package gnucash for openSUSE:Factory checked 
in at 2015-07-14 17:43:55
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/gnucash (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.gnucash.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "gnucash"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/gnucash/gnucash.changes  2015-04-10 
09:52:07.000000000 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.gnucash.new/gnucash.changes     2015-07-14 
17:45:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,15 @@
+Wed Jul  8 20:46:48 UTC 2015 - [email protected]
+
+- Update to version 2.6.7:
+  + Fix hidden panes in lot viewer.
+  + Fix some abs() errors from new clang and gcc versions.
+  + Fix dbi driver detection on linux and similar.
+  + Improve "Auto pay on posting" message.
+  + Enable travis continuous integration tests on the gnucash
+    repository.
+  + Bugs fixed: bgo#681225, bgo#739271, bgo#744858, bgo#746792,
+    bgo#734183, bgo#746163, bgo#746873, bgo#747812, bgo#747377,
+    bgo#740955, bgo#747300, bgo#746977.
+  + Updated translations.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  gnucash-2.6.6.tar.gz

New:
----
  gnucash-2.6.7.tar.gz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ gnucash.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.szWWnY/_old  2015-07-14 17:45:07.000000000 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.szWWnY/_new  2015-07-14 17:45:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 
 Name:           gnucash
-Version:        2.6.6
+Version:        2.6.7
 Release:        0
 Summary:        Personal Finance Manager
 License:        SUSE-GPL-2.0-with-openssl-exception or 
SUSE-GPL-3.0-with-openssl-exception

++++++ gnucash-2.6.6.tar.gz -> gnucash-2.6.7.tar.gz ++++++
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/gnucash/gnucash-2.6.6.tar.gz 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.gnucash.new/gnucash-2.6.7.tar.gz differ: char 5, 
line 1


Reply via email to