> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>
> Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0 
> framework/config more rigid and to remove the 
> ResultInterceptor stuff and specifically hard code the 
> ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ the servlet 
> itself (problem solved, but then generic results aren't 
> possible in WW, which includes chaining, and then we open up 
> the door to possibly more hardcoding). Anyway, I'm outta 
> here, let me know what you guys think.
> 
> -Pat
> 

-1 to hardcoding. I like the way the core framework services are
becoming pluggable replaceable interceptors. I still don't understand
the reason for wanting to access actions from their view URLs...

Jason


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to