I don't plan on using it, so as long as it doesn't mess up the core +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? > [Small problem + solution?] > > > I found a possible way around this, but I'm not sure if it's > a good idea or not :) > > What if the FilterDispatcher never actually makes a call to > filterChain.doFilter()? This would get around the "duplicate > view request" problem outlined below, but would require that > the filter -must- be the last one applied or else you'll > loose the application of filters further down the chain. I > don't think this is too bad though, since we can just > -clearly- document that the FilterDispatcher (if you want to > use it) must be applied last. > > Thoughts? > > -Pat > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:33 AM > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? > [Small problem] > > > > Found one small problem with this approach (and it may just be that > > using the filter + the servlet at all times just can't always work > > perfectly): > > > > If you are using the filter and servlet and access > "success.jsp", the > action > > will be invoked, then the ResultInterceptor will kick in, call > > ServletDispatcherResult, which will see that the filter is > in use and > _not_ > > dispatch, since the filter is going to chain right after. > This is the > > correct behavior. > > > > But.... if the result of the action executing is > _different_ than the > > URL being request (ie: "error.jsp"), the > ServletDispatcherResult does > > what it should (dispatch out to error.jsp) but the filter > will still > > try to grab > the > > original request to success.jsp. > > > > Thoughts? One way would be to make the WW 2.0 framework/config more > > rigid and to remove the ResultInterceptor stuff and > specifically hard > > code the ServletDispatcher to doing the dispatching _in_ > the servlet > > itself > (problem > > solved, but then generic results aren't possible in WW, > which includes > > chaining, and then we open up the door to possibly more hardcoding). > Anyway, > > I'm outta here, let me know what you guys think. > > > > -Pat > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rickard Öberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:06 AM > > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] WebWork 2.0: FilterDispatcher? > > > > > > > Patrick Lightbody wrote: > > > <snippetysnap> > > > > What do you think? Rickard, would this work for you? Everyone > > > > else, > > would > > > > this work for YOU? ;) > > > > > > Works for me! :-) > > > > > > /Rickard > > > > > > -- > > > Rickard Öberg > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Senselogic > > > > > > Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for > Techies! Can't > > > afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive > scholarships. Get > > > hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. > > > www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld > http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =omething 2 > See! http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork >
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
