It's implemented as a combination of a tag (either JSP or callable from
Velocity) and an Interceptor... I don't know how this would translate to
WW1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dick Zetterberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.3
> 
> 
> Sounds good to me!
> 
> Will the form tag include the token/single submit 
> functionality? (I'm not sure exactly how this was implemented 
> in WW2 so if I am way off then never mind).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dick Zetterberg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hani Suleiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:31 PM
> Subject: [OS-webwork] Webwork 1.3
> 
> 
> > To all non webwork2 junkies:
> >
> > Any objections to adding ui:hidden and ui:form tags to webwork 1.3?
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites 
> including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are 
> available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or 
> Visual Studio .NET. 
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet
_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to