First of all, thanks to everybody involved in WW/XWork for great work!
When I looked into ParametersInterceptor I found this:
// populate model bean's fields if action is ModelDriven, otherwise populate action's fields
if (action instanceof ModelDriven) {
OgnlUtil.setProperties(ActionContext.getContext().getParameters(),
((ModelDriven) action).getModel(),
ActionContext.getContext().getContextMap());
} else {
OgnlUtil.setProperties(ActionContext.getContext().getParameters(),
action,
ActionContext.getContext().getContextMap());
}
I have situation where my action is ModelDriven but it would be helpful to set some fields which are action specific and not model. So I may have an action flow control parameter like debug (bad example) which has setter and getter in action. The action would otherwise work fully model driven.
Looking at this interceptor code it seems that this situation is not possible? I would imagine that dualism I described would be appreciated though it comes with slight performance hit.
Or am I just missing something that would enable behaviour I described? --
Marko Lahma
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
