Is there a way to have this type of notification collected in a digest, and
sent to this list once a day|week?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Patrick Lightbody
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-336) Iterator tags
value attribute required


For me, I like keeping this list for purely communication only. Four
reasons:

1) I check the CVS list for automated stuff and this list for discussions.
Having stuff sent here blurs that line
2) People sometimes reply to the creation emails, but that discussion is
never logged in to JIRA -- then I feel obligated to keep track of this
communication.
3) I rarely check the CVS list because I don't have time to dig through all
these things -- likewise I barely have time to keep up with this list as is.
I'd rather not have even more to digest.
4) A subject of "[OS-webwork][JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-336) ..." is WAY too
long. I need to be able to see what the thread is about without having to
look over 50+ characters. In the end I just ignore these emails.

Why not use the CVS list, or even the "issues" list on java.net? That might
be better, since if anyone uses the java.net issue tracker emails are sent
there as well.

-Pat

>From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS]  Created: (WW-336) Iterator tags value
>attribute required
>Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:20:22 -0500
>
>I reset it back to the Xwork/WebWork notification scheme (it had been
>turned off altogether)... I think it's valuable for new issues to come
>here, so everyone can see what the issues are and might see that they're
>not the only one seeing this... Only issue creation comes here now, more
>notifications go to the cvs list on dev.java.net.
>
>If others disagree, we can remove this list from all notifications.
>
>Jason
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 8:38 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [JIRA-OS] Created: (WW-336)
> > Iterator tags value attribute required
> >
> >
> > ARGH!
> >
> > We've been over this before. Please do NOT have every new issue sent
> > here, this is supposed to go to a separate cvs list for those
> > who care.
> >
> > On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 05:29 AM,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Message:
> > >
> > >   A new issue has been created in JIRA.
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > View the issue:
> > >
> > >   http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-336
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is an overview of the issue:
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >         Key: WW-336
> > >     Summary: Iterator tags value attribute required
> > >        Type: Bug
> > >
> > >      Status: Unassigned
> > >    Priority: Critical
> > >
> > >     Project: WebWork
> > >    Versions:
> > >              2.0-beta2
> > >
> > >    Assignee:
> > >    Reporter: John Patterson
> > >
> > >     Created: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 4:29 AM
> > >     Updated: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 4:29 AM
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > The 'value' attribute of the IteratorTag should be optional allowing
> > > it to default to the object at the top of the stack.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > JIRA INFORMATION:
> > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > >
> > > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> > administrators:
> > >    http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
> > >
> > > If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
> > >    http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

_________________________________________________________________
High-speed Internet access as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local
service providers in your area). Click here.   https://broadband.msn.com



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to