Also.. Pester them about upgrading to have better eclipse cvs support,
since that won't happen til Nov... :(

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pat Lightbody
Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2003 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] CVS problems


Alright alright, don't let Hani bait you. I pretty much agree with you,
I suggest you complain to java.net. While you're at it, can you ask them
WTF happened to our clickstream and sitemesh projects? :)

-Pat

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Drew McAuliffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:01 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] CVS problems


> I disagree with that pretty strongly. I've been getting the latest 
> from CVS without any hassle from sourceforge for a while now. This is 
> the first time I've had to work with the latest again, and the 
> repository has changed. If that repository change means new rules for 
> CVS access, this is a perfectly legitimate place to ask about those 
> new rules. Hence the question, and my distaste at your reply.
>
> I don't think that it should be necessary to register on the site to 
> get CVS guest or anonymous access, just as I wouldn't think it should 
> be necessary to register with a website to gain access to an 
> opensource executable. It's an unnecessary step that is usually used 
> to gather emails. 90% of the OS code out there doesn't require 
> registration for anonymous access and I would be against webwork 
> requiring it as well. It's an impediment to the project's growth 
> because of the extra steps and the aversion a lot of people have to 
> registering themselves on every website that asks them to.
>
> I would also think that it would be in the best interest of the growth

> of the project to save the bile for personal blogs, no?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

> Hani Suleiman
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] CVS problems
>
>
> You go to java.net, sign up, and apply for the observer role at the 
> webwork project pages.
>
> People who run cvs should definitely NOT be users who are too lazy to 
> go through those incredibly simple steps!
>
> A project is pretty screwed if its growth depends on 
> instant-gratification anonymous cvs access.
>
> On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 08:42 PM, Drew McAuliffe wrote:
>
> > How does one go about doing that? And whatever happened to anonymous

> > access? I would think that anonymous access would allow for a much 
> > wider distribution of the codebase. If everyone has to apply for 
> > observer access, the project isn't going to grow very fast.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> > Of
>
> > Hani Suleiman
> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:21 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] CVS problems
> >
> >
> > Just apply for an observer role in the webwork project.
> >
> > On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 08:20 PM, Drew McAuliffe wrote:
> >
> >> I'm having problems getting the latest from the new CVS repository.

> >> Neither the anoncvs or the guest/guest logins work. Does anyone 
> >> have the valid guest account name, and can the java.net site be 
> >> updated with it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Drew
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> >> Welcome to geek heaven.
> >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to