On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:50:50AM +0200, Paul D wrote:
> On 2024-04-02 23:00, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > Second, appears the ${parameter:offset:length} may not be POSIX.  I
> > dislike this, but do not object since OpenWRT's shell is built with this
> > functionality enabled.
> 
> 
> UUOC! Ha. Yes, there are a few non POSIXy things in openwrt ash. A number of 
> other scripts already take advantage of them so it's OK, if it avoids several 
> external calls to e.g. cut or td.
> 

Yes, which is why even though I disliked it, I wouldn't be able to reject
merely for that.

> How about POSIX native array IFS split?
> 
> 
> IFS=' ' set -- $(hexdump -vn 5 -e '5/1 "%02x "' /dev/urandom)
> 
> uci -q batch <<-EOF >/dev/null
>       set network.globals.ula_prefix=fd$1:$2$3:$4$5::/48
>       commit network
> EOF

That is certainly better than the solution I came up with.  More
importantly, it addresses concern #1.  Now just need a better commit
message and hopefully the committers would find it acceptable.


-- 
(\___(\___(\______          --=> 8-) EHM <=--          ______/)___/)___/)
 \BS (    |         ehem+sig...@m5p.com  PGP 87145445         |    )   /
  \_CS\   |  _____  -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O-   _____  |   /  _/
8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445



_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to