I am curious.
What are you trying to accomplish by
decreasing rollback segment size??
- Babette
-----Original Message-----
Lewis
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:52 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Looking at your trace file, most of your lost time appears
to be in an update of F4211.
UPDATE CRPDTA.F4211
SET SDRSDJ=:BND1,SDPPDJ=:BND2,
SDCARS=:BND3,SDMOT=:BND4,
SDFRTH=:BND5,SDUSER=:BND6,SDPID=:BND7,
SDJOBN=:BND8,SDUPMJ=:BND9,SDTDAY= :BND10
WHERE ( SDCDCD = :KEY1 )
9 seconds CPU, 283 seconds elapsed.
I doubt if freelists are your problem, but possibly the
lost time is initrans. NB from 8.1.6 you can change
initrans without rebuilding the table - which is good
if you don't have to go back to the old data and keep
doing the same concurrent updates.
There is no point in going above initrans = 20, but
you might push it up to 10. This may improve the
enqueue (TX mode 4?) problem, but if it does it
will probably make the log sync problem worse.
Try and swing more resources into DBWn -
increase LRU latches to start with, and
check whether async I/O, I/O slaves, or
multiple db_writers works best for you.
You may also want to review the size of
your log files (upwards), and your rollback
segments (downwards).
Jonathan Lewis
Seminars on getting the best out of Oracle
Last few places available for Sept 10th/11th
See http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
[snipped]
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Babette Turner-Underwood
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
