Hello,

I've got a question I'm wondering about quite some while now.
The question is how much structural difference is necessary for a model to
clearly become a new model?
When I fold something from Crease Pattern the structure of the model should
be the same in the end, no matter how I arrived there. But that leads to
another phenomenon, it is possible to use a completely different folding
sequence to come to a structurally identical model. So is this still the
same model? I mean the outcome may be similar, but the path to get there
isn't.
The question gets even more complicated when I fold a model from a picture
only without a CP or any other clues. I've done that before so it is
clearly possible. But then I also had the case that even if it looks the
same, it is structurally not the same because I started with a differently
shaped paper (square instead of rectangle).
Of course if I fold something from CP or picture I attribute the model to
the initial designer of the model, because if it hadn't been for his input,
I would never have gotten the idea to fold this model. But still I
sometimes wonder whether this is even correct.
I know at least three models by heart where I found a very nice folding
sequence to later find out that the original designer folds them completely
different. Two of them end up with minor differences at the end. The
differences are of structural nature and not openly visible, so the models
look exactly the same, even though they are not.
I wonder this because sometimes for really simple models someone folds a
single fold differently and calls it hos own model. Here I do all the folds
differently, but end up with a similar looking model and don't attribute it
to myself, even though the difference is much higher than on the simple
model with just a slight difference. Know what I mean?
So what is your opinion to this subject?

And then I've got a second question that is even more pressing for me.
Lets say I've derived at my own folding sequence for a specific model and I
want to share it with the world by publishing diagrams for it, am I allowed
to?
Do I need permission from the author? I mean it is not something he came up
with, just the result is the same and like I said, maybe even not
completely. I guess it would be the nice thing to ask, but the folding
sequence is my own and not his.

I'd really like to hear your opinion on that matter.

Nice Greetings

Anna from Vienna, Austria.

Reply via email to