Hi Alex, This might very well be a gap in the OSGi JMX spec. There are a number of other changes that are requested for the JMX specification, so maybe we can combine all of them in a future release...
Best regards, David On 15 December 2010 14:15, Alex Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am going through the JMX Management Model specification for R4.2 and the > ObjectNames for the OSGi MBeans do not seem to consider the fact that there > may be more than one running OSGi framework instances at a time in the same > JVM and thus likely the same MBean server. > > For example, the ObjectName for the FrameworkMBean is "osgi.core: > type=framework,version=1.5" which has no indication of which OSGi framework > instance it is target to. > > Am I mis-understanding the spec, or is a "parent=framework-instance-id" > property of sorts missing from the ObjectName, or is it a restriction that > each OSGi framework instance be deployed to a different MBean server? > > Yours sincerely, > Alex > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > _______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
