They NEVER have.anywhere.

B

 

latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/sc-dc-1103-iran-sanctions-20101102,0,3236
458.story

latimes.com

Sanctions on Iran aren't working, diplomat says

A senior European envoy, speaking anonymously, says economic punishments
aren't pushing Tehran toward a compromise on the country's disputed nuclear
program.

By Paul Richter, Tribune Washington Bureau

2:06 PM PDT, November 2, 2010

Reporting from WashingtonWestern powers' strong new sanctions on Iran have
so far failed to push Tehran's leaders toward compromise on their disputed
nuclear program, a senior European diplomat said Tuesday.

In a grim assessment, the European official said that while the economic
punishments clearly have inflicted pain on Iran, there has been no signal
from its leaders that they are willing to yield ground to relieve the
international pressure.

Though Iran officially has been calling for new negotiations over its
program, the diplomat said he had not seen a single statement to indicate a
change in its leaders' political views on the nuclear program. Instead, some
voices within Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's regime insist there is
"no way" they will give ground, and that "there is no need for a meeting,"
he said.

Since the imposition of the latest sanctions last summer, "the whole
question has been, 'Is that going to create a new political situation?'" the
diplomat told a group of reporters. "We haven't seen anything yet."

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of
the issue.

Many countries believe Iran is pursuing a nuclear program to acquire the
know-how to build weapons; the Iranian government insists it is interested
only in peaceful nuclear projects.

In June, the United Nations Security Council imposed sanctions on Iran that
focused on individuals and companies with ties to its nuclear and military
programs. Later in the summer, the United States, the European Union,
Canada, Australia, South Korea and other industrialized nations added
tougher unilateral sanctions, which hit harder at Iran's lucrative energy
sector, its trade and ties to international finance.

By most accounts the Iranian economy, which already had serious problems,
has been further damaged by the second set of sanctions.

Yet the effect has been reduced by the willingness of some developing
countries - all of which objected to the unilateral sanctions - to keep
doing some business with the Islamic Republic's lucrative energy sector.
These include China, Russia, Turkey, India and Brazil.

Iranian officials recently indicated that they are willing to restart talks
on their nuclear program with world powers after Nov. 10, although key
details of the negotiations remain unresolved.

The European diplomat said that in the last five years, Western attempts to
negotiate with Iran have fallen into a fruitless pattern: Tehran will be
coaxed to meet with foreign diplomats twice, but when a third meeting
approaches "it will all peter out." So far, he said, it appears the latest
proposed talks may follow the same routine.

The official said he saw no reason to believe that threats of Western
military force would change Tehran's thinking. Talk of the military option
"hasn't moved in any way the Iranian regime," he said.

U.S. officials generally have been more optimistic on the prospects for
negotiating, stressing that sanctions by the U.S., Europeans and the United
Nations have cut off financial and trade ties and hurt the country's
lucrative energy business.

The European diplomat said a group of world powers is still debating how to
frame another long-discussed proposal, which would give Iran isotopes for
medical treatments in its hospitals if it agreed to temporarily surrender
part of its stockpile of nuclear material.

The deal's goal would be to limit how many nuclear weapons Iran could build.
But since the idea was first floated a year ago, Iran has continued to
accumulate uranium, substantially increasing its supply.

Now the so-called Vienna Group - the United States, France, Russia and the
United Nation's nuclear agency - are debating how much material they want
Iran to surrender, and where they would store it, the diplomat said. Since
Iran now has more uranium, the group wants it to surrender more.

Iran's representative to the U.N.'s nuclear agency was quoted Tuesday as
rejecting that suggestion.

"I'm afraid there is no logic for these kinds of statements," Ali Asghar
Soltanieh, the Iranian representative, told Reuters in Vienna.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to