Turkey's Christians under Siege

by John Eibner
Middle East Quarterly
Spring 2011, pp. 41-52  <http://www.meforum.org/meq/pdfs/2907.pdf> (view PDF)

http://www.meforum.org/2907/turkey-christians

The brutal murder of the head of Turkey's Catholic Church, Bishop Luigi 
Padovese, on June 3, 2010, has rattled the country's small, diverse, and 
hard-pressed Christian community.[1] <>  The 62-year-old bishop, who 
spearheaded the Vatican's efforts to improve Muslim-Christian relations in 
Turkey, was stabbed repeatedly at his Iskenderun home by his driver and 
bodyguard Murat Altun, who concluded the slaughter by decapitating Padovese and 
shouting, "I killed the Great Satan. Allahu Akhbar!" He then told the police 
that he had acted in obedience to a "command from God."[2] <> 


http://www.meforum.org/pics/large/159.jpg

The brutal murder on June 3, 2010, of the head of Turkey's Catholic church, 
Bishop Luigi Padovese, seen here in 2006 leading the funeral procession of 
another slain priest, Andrea Santoro, was met by denials and obfuscation—not 
only by the Turkish authorities but also by Western governments and even the 
Vatican.

Though bearing all the hallmarks of a jihadist execution, the murder was met by 
denials and obfuscation—not only by the Turkish authorities but also by Western 
governments and the Vatican. This is not wholly surprising. In the post-9/11 
era, it has become commonplace to deny connections between Islam and acts of 
violence despite much evidence to the contrary.[3] <>  But while this denial 
has undoubtedly sought to win the hearts and minds of Muslims, as opposed to 
Christians, Jews, or any other religious group, it has served to encourage 
Islamist terrorism and to exacerbate the persecution of non-Muslim minorities 
even in the most secularized Muslim states. For all President Barack Obama's 
high praise for its "strong, vibrant, secular democracy,"[4] <>  and Prime 
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's "Alliance of Civilizations" rhetoric, Turkey is 
very much entrenched in the clash of civilizations paradigm. Unless Ankara is 
prepared to combat the widespread "Christophobia" that fuels violence and other 
forms of repression, the country's Christians are doomed to remain an oppressed 
and discriminated against minority, and Turkey's aspirations of democratic 
transformation and full integration with Europe will remain stillborn.


The Victim and His Mission


Consecrated bishop in November 2004, half a year following Cardinal Joseph 
Ratzinger's elevation to the papacy, Padovese belonged to the body of 
intellectually sharp, proactive clerics who share Benedict XVI's ecumenical 
understanding of the church and its global mission of evangelization, 
especially in the Islamic Middle East where a century of intensive 
de-Christianization now threatens the faith's regional existence.

Padovese's mission in Turkey was to help save the country's Christian community 
from extinction and to create conditions for its religious and cultural 
renaissance. Rejecting the church's historic dhimmi status as a protected 
religious minority under Islam—which reduced it to little more than a 
submissive worshipping agency with no other legitimate activity—he viewed 
Turkey's European Union candidacy as a golden opportunity for winning 
significant concessions from Ankara and pinned high hopes on the Special 
Assembly for the Middle East of the Synod of Bishops, which took place in Rome 
in October 2010.[5] <>  However, the synod ended on a sour note. While 
confirming the Second Vatican Council's positive shift in attitude toward 
Judaism and unequivocal rejection of anti-Semitism, the Middle Eastern bishops 
sought to enhance the security of their flocks by playing an anti-Israel card 
and criticizing Israel—the one country of the region with a growing Christian 
population—with a directness that was not employed in relation to any Islamic 
state, no matter how repressive.

Had it not been for his murder, the bishop would have traveled to meet the pope 
in Cyprus on the very next day for the launch of the synod's Instrumentum 
laboris, the Vatican's strategic plan for reviving Christianity in its Middle 
Eastern cradle, to which Padovese was a substantial contributor.

Though written in low-key Vatican jargon, the Instrumentum laboris is full of 
radical implications for Turkey and the broader Middle East.[6] <>  In contrast 
to the common post-9/11 predilection to downplay Islamism's less savory 
aspects, the document does not gloss over the disadvantaged position of 
Christians in the Islamic world and identifies the issue of human rights, 
including religious freedom, as central to the well-being of the whole of 
society:

Oftentimes, relations between Christians and Muslims are difficult, principally 
because Muslims make no distinction between religion and politics, thereby 
relegating Christians to the precarious position of being considered 
non-citizens, despite the fact that they were citizens of their countries long 
before the rise of Islam. The key to harmonious living between Christians and 
Muslims is to recognize religious freedom and human rights.[7] <> 

This harmonious living was to be achieved through a policy of dialogue—defined 
by Benedict XVI at the beginning of his papacy as "a vital necessity, on which 
in large measure our future depends"[8] <> —that would identify the common 
ground between the two religions: service to society, respect for common moral 
values, the avoidance of syncretism, joint opposition to the atheism, 
materialism, and relativism emanating from the Western world, and a collective 
rejection of religious-based violence, that is—killing in the name of God.

The Instrumentum laboris also encouraged a search—together with Muslim 
reformers—for a new system of church-state relations, which it referred to as 
"positive laicity." But the Vatican does not uphold Turkey's secularism—which 
the George W. Bush and Obama administrations have praised as a model for the 
Islamic world—as the answer. "In Turkey," the Instrumentum laboris 
notes—undoubtedly on account of the influence of Bishop Padovese—"the idea of 
'laicity' is currently posing more problems for full religious freedom in the 
country." The working document did not elaborate but simply stated that the aim 
of this "positive," as opposed to "Turkish laicity," would be to help eliminate 
the theocratic character of government and allow for greater equality among 
citizens of different religions, thereby fostering the promotion of a sound 
democracy, positively secular in nature, which also fully acknowledges the role 
of religion in public life while completely respecting the distinction between 
the religious and civic orders.[9] <> 

These were the principles that guided Padovese's Turkish mission. He worked in 
the clear knowledge that "faithfully witnessing to Christ"—as the synod's 
preparatory document acknowledges—"can lead to persecution."[10] <>  And so it 
did.


Conspiracy of Silence


Within hours of Padovese's death, the provincial governor preempted the results 
of police investigations with the announcement that the murder was not 
politically motivated but rather committed by a lone lunatic.[11] <>  Moreover, 
in an attempt to eliminate any Islamic motive, NTV Turkey announced that the 
murderer was not actually a Muslim but a convert to Catholicism.[12] <>  Then 
the police leaked word—allegedly from the assassin—that he had been "forced to 
suffer abuse" in a homosexual relationship with the bishop and that the killing 
had been an act of "legitimate defense."[13] <> 

It is true that Turkey's minister for culture and tourism, Ertuğrul Günay, 
issued a short message of condolences on behalf of the government[14] <>  and 
that the foreign ministry expressed regret to the international media. But 
neither President Abdullah Gül nor Prime Minister Erdoğan expressed their own 
condolences or publicly addressed the murder of the head of their country's 
Catholic Church, and even the foreign ministry's statement took care to 
highlight the murderer's alleged "psychological problems."[15] <> 

Erdoğan's silence in response to this national tragedy was particularly 
striking. Together with Spanish prime minister Jose Luis Rodrigues Zapatero, 
the Turkish prime minister and leader of the ruling Islamist Peace and Justice 
Party (AKP) has been a principal architect and cosponsor of the U.N.'s flagship 
program to promote a global "Alliance of Civilizations." Diversity, 
cross-cultural dialogue, and opposition to isolation of "the other" were among 
the principles articulated by Erdoğan in his attempts to present Turkey as "the 
best panacea against 'clash of civilizations' theories."[16] <>  The beheading 
of a senior Christian cleric by a Muslim zealot could not but send an 
unmistakable message that this very clash was in full swing on Erdoğan's home 
turf.

Moreover, at the time of the murder, Erdoğan was both sending thinly veiled 
threats of Turkey's growing impatience with the slow progress of its EU 
application and seeking to enhance his stature throughout the Islamic world 
with menacing anti-Israel diplomacy in response to its interception of the 
Turkey-originated Gaza flotilla.[17] <>  He thus had nothing to gain and much 
to lose by generating headlines about Padovese's execution.

So did Washington and its European allies. If Western diplomats spoke at all 
about the bishop's murder, it was in the same hushed tones that are used when 
referring to Turkey's Armenian genocide of World War I, its subsequent use of 
terror against remnant Christian communities and Kurdish villages, its 1974 
invasion of Cyprus and subsequent ethnic cleansing of the occupied Christian 
population, and its blockade of neighboring Armenia.

Well aware of the absence of backing from Western powers, the Vatican acted 
swiftly to avoid confrontation with Turkey. Notwithstanding an early 
observation by Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi that the murder highlighted 
the "difficult conditions" of the church in the region,[18] <>  the official 
explanation was swiftly harmonized with that of Ankara. In a statement 
broadcast on Vatican Radio on the same day, Lombardi negated his previous 
comment by stating that "political motivations for the attack or other 
motivations linked to socio-political tensions are to be excluded." He also 
stressed the killer's "mental imbalance"[19] <>  as if solo psychopaths might 
be a primary source of the church's difficult conditions in the Islamic world.

The day after the murder, while en route to one of Europe's hot spots of 
Muslim-Christian communal tension—the divided island of Cyprus—Pope Benedict 
XVI himself sought to quash speculation about its motivation. He admitted that 
he still had "very little information" about the killing, yet endorsed—much to 
the bewilderment of Christians in Turkey—the Turkish government's reflexive 
denial of a religious-political motive when he declared, "We must not attribute 
the fact [of Bishop Padovese's murder] to Turkey … What is certain is that it 
was not a religious or political assassination."[20] <> 


The Lessons of Regensburg


Why did the pope so swiftly deny political or religious motives for Padovese's 
murder when so much about the crime was still shrouded in mystery? Benedict XVI 
provided a motive when he explained, "We do not want this tragic situation to 
become mixed up with dialogue with Islam or with all the problems of our 
journey [to Cyprus]."[21] <>  A quarrel with Ankara at this particular juncture 
could certainly have had damaging repercussions for the church, but behind the 
pontiff's timidity, lay his keen awareness of how easy it was to trigger the 
destructive rage of the Islamic powers and the temporal weakness of his church.

Indeed, a few months before his ascendancy in May 2005, the pope-to-be caused 
consternation in Turkey by declaring his opposition to its application for EU 
membership because "historically and culturally, Turkey has little in common 
with Europe."[22] <>  Upon Ratzinger's election to the papacy, Erdoğan opined 
that his "rhetoric may change from now on … because this post, this 
responsibility, requires it."[23] <> 

Benedict XVI did lower his tone but not before the mass demonstrations, 
violence, and threats that followed his now famous Regensburg University 
lecture of September 2006—just two months before he was scheduled to travel to 
Istanbul for his first papal foray into the world of Islam. At Regensburg, the 
pope broached one of the key issues obstructing harmonious relations between 
the Muslim and non-Muslim worlds: the sensitive question of violent jihad as a 
legitimate means of advancing the Islamic faith.[24] <> 

In his address, the pope overstepped a red line drawn by Muslim political 
elites throughout the world. Erdoğan joined angry Muslim clerics and statesmen, 
demanding that the pope apologize for his "wrong, ugly, and unfortunate 
statements" and calling into question whether the planned papal visit to 
Istanbul would take place.[25] <>  He was followed by Director for Religious 
Affairs Ali Bardakoğlu—the overseer of the Turkish state's massive financial 
support for Islamic institutions, including those in Europe, especially 
Germany[26] <> —who condemned the pope's message as reflecting "anger, 
hostility, and hatred" in addition to a "Crusader and holy-war mentality."[27] 
<>  The deputy chairman of Erdoğan's AKP Party, Salih Kapusuz, announced that 
the Regensburg speech would place Benedict XVI in the "same category as Hitler 
and Mussolini."[28] <> 

Left isolated and exposed by Washington and Europe, the pope quickly succumbed 
to pressure. To be sure, he did not retract a single word uttered at 
Regensburg, and his apology was more of a regretful explanation than an 
admission of error, but his humble and appeasing demeanor was conciliatory 
enough to salvage his church's dialogue with Islam and keep the door open to 
Istanbul. Since then, he has taken extraordinary pains to temper his language 
and make flattering gestures to avoid frenzied Muslim responses.

Consider Benedict XVI's November 2006 visit to Turkey—his first as pope to a 
Muslim-majority country. While reiterating the Vatican's customary plea for 
religious liberty, his remarks were overshadowed by his gestures of goodwill 
aimed at underscoring his esteem for Islam and Turkey's Islamist government, 
notably his prayer facing Mecca in Istanbul's Blue Mosque and his praise for 
Erdoğan's role in launching the Alliance of Civilizations.[29] <> 

The biggest plum for Erdoğan was the indication that the pope would now welcome 
Turkey's membership in the EU.[30] <>  Although the Vatican made no mention of 
it, the Turkish press announced that Benedict XVI had endorsed Erdoğan's plan 
to establish a bureau of Turkey's Directorate of Religious Affairs in Brussels 
to "counter efforts to inflame Islamophobia."[31] <> 

The Regensburg speech led to the harmonization of the Vatican's diplomatic 
language with that of Turkey and the Alliance of Civilizations, on which the 
Padovese murder had no apparent effect. Anti-Christian violence remains a 
powerful factor in influencing the language of the church as it struggles to 
balance its fundamental, unwavering advocacy of religious freedom and 
opposition to killing in the name of God with the pursuit of dialogue with 
Turkey and other Muslim majority states.


The Plot Thickens


Not all Christians in Turkey accepted the denials and obfuscation of Ankara and 
the Vatican about the circumstances surrounding the murder. Foremost among them 
was the archbishop of Smyrna, Ruggero Franceschini—Padovese's successor as head 
of the country's Catholic Church—who rejected the official explanation of his 
colleague's murder and maintained that the pope had received "bad counsel" 
prior to his denial of the murder's political or religious motives.[32] <> 

The archbishop had lived in Iskenderun, where the murder took place, and had 
known the assassin and his family personally. In the hope of ascertaining the 
true facts, he immediately visited the scene of the crime, subsequently telling 
the press that he could not accept the "usual hastily concocted, pious lie" 
about the murderer's insanity. He also dismissed the claim that the assassin 
was a Catholic convert, confirming that he was a non-practicing Muslim.[33] <> 

The archbishop did not doubt the murder's religious and political motivation. 
"I believe that with this murder, which has an explicitly religious element, we 
are faced with something that goes beyond government," he said. "It points 
towards nostalgic, perhaps anarchist groups who want to destabilize the 
government. The very modalities of the murder aim to manipulate public 
opinion."[34] <> 

What the archbishop suspected was a crime stage-managed by Turkey's "deep 
state"—an opaque underworld where powerful elements within the state, 
especially the military and security services, act in conjunction with violent 
extremist groups, such as the ultra-nationalist Grey Wolves and the Islamist 
Hezbollah, as well as the apolitical criminal underworld, to undertake special, 
illegal operations in the political interest of the country's ruling elite.[35] 
<> 

Until recently, the deep state was imbued with the secularist ideology of the 
republic's founding father, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. But since coming to power in 
2003, Erdoğan's AKP has vigorously endeavored to lay hands on all levers of 
power including the deep state with a view to promoting its Islamist, 
"neo-Ottoman" vision for the country.[36] <>  This has in turn produced a 
schizophrenic deep state with older elements loyal to the Kemalist opposition 
and newer elements loyal to the AKP's Islamist agenda.

Since 2007, the Turkish media has feasted on a steady stream of revelations 
about an extensive deep state network called "Ergenekon." Government 
prosecutors have secured the arrest and indictment of scores of retired and 
still-serving military and security officials for allegedly plotting to 
destabilize the AKP-dominated government. Show trials are already underway.

Deep state documents released by the prosecution, if taken at face value, point 
to Ergenekon as a source of anti-church activity, including the torture and 
Islamic-style ritual murder of three evangelical Christian book publishers in 
the town of Malatya in April 2006.[37] <> 

The Ergenekon conspiracy has been similarly linked with the murder of the 
61-year-old Catholic priest, Fr. Andrea Santoro—shot and killed in his Trabzon 
church in February 2006. Witnesses report that the convicted killer, a 
16-year-old, shouted "Allahu Akbar" immediately before firing his pistol.[38] 
<>  Bishop Padovese said at the time that the assassination "did not seem 
incidental" as it occurred while passions were aroused by the Danish cartoon 
affair.[39] <>  The former papal nuncio to Turkey, Msgr. Antonio Lucibello, had 
similarly argued that there was a mastermind behind Santoro's murder.[40] <> 

Prosecutors also ascribed the January 2007 murder of the Armenian Christian 
journalist, Hrant Dink, by a 17-year-old, to the Ergenekon.[41] <> A vigorous 
and well-known campaigner against Turkey's denial of the Armenian genocide, 
Dink had been convicted of having violated article 302 of the penal code 
banning "insults to Turkishness." The hanged body of Dink's Turkish lawyer, 
Hakan Karadağ, was found in suspicious circumstances the day after the Padovese 
murder.[42] <> 

It is far from certain whether the alleged anti-AKP Ergenekon conspiracy is a 
reality, or whether it is largely an AKP fabrication, designed to cover the 
efforts of Erdoğan's Islamists to turn the deep state into an instrument for 
promoting their own agenda.[43] <>  But whoever may be pulling the strings, 
Kemalists or Islamists, the deep state is no friend of Turkey's Christians.


A Turkish Anti-Christian Agenda


Persecution, however, is by no means limited to the deep state. Like their 
counterparts in most of the Islamic Middle East, Turkey's Christians are 
effective hostages to the arbitrary actions of powerful elites, made up of 
Islamic state and non-state actors who collectively monopolize violence. The 
oldest Christians retain living memory of the state-sponsored mass deportations 
and massacres that culminated in the World War I Armenian genocide. During the 
twentieth century, Turkey's Christian population has dropped to the verge of 
extinction.[44] <>  The last anti-Christian mass violence was the 1955 deep 
state-sparked, anti-Greek pogrom in Istanbul, which also took a heavy toll on 
the city's Jewish and Armenian populations.[45] <> 

Such memories are reinforced in the younger generation of Christians by 
continuing acts of smaller scale and more discriminative violence. In February 
2006, for example, a Slovenian priest was attacked by a gang of teenagers in 
the parish compound in Izmir (Smyrna), and five months later a 74-year-old 
clergyman was stabbed by young Turks on a street in Trabzon, following which 
Padovese told the media, "The climate has changed … it is the Catholic priests 
that are being attacked."[46] <>  In December 2007, another priest was knifed 
by a teenager as he left his church following Sunday mass.[47] <> 

A leader of the Turkish Protestant community, Rev. Behnan Konutgan, recently 
recorded cases of violence against church property and the physical harassment 
of church members while a noted Turkish sociologist of religion, Ali Carkoğlu, 
has argued that no non-Muslim religious gathering in Turkey is completely risk 
free.[48] <> 

What little protective law there is, whether national or international, does 
not have the strength to provide adequate defense. Plain-speaking about 
persecution invites hostile reactions, sometimes deadly. The church's language 
of dialogue is powerfully influenced by this reality. But there are some voices 
in Turkey that do not always cower to the violence-backed taboos of official 
Christian-Muslim dialogue or of the Alliance of Civilizations.

At the end of 2009, Bartholomew I, the normally subservient Ecumenical Orthodox 
patriarch of Constantinople, appeared on CBS's 60 Minutes and shocked Turkey's 
political establishment. Speaking to Bob Simon, the patriarch reported no 
significant improvement in conditions for the church. Instead, he argued that 
Turkey's Christians were second class citizens and that he personally felt 
"crucified" by a state that wanted to see his church die out. Asked whether 
Erdoğan had responded to the petitions submitted to him in the course of many 
meetings, Bartholomew answered, "Never."[49] <> 

Turkey's rulers lashed out angrily. "We consider the crucifixion metaphor an 
extremely unfortunate metaphor," argued Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu. "In 
our history, there have never been crucifixions, and there never will be. I 
couldn't really reconcile this metaphor with his mature personality."[50] <>  
President Gül endorsed the foreign minister's assessment while the head of the 
ruling AKP's international relations section, Kürsat Tüzmen, menacingly 
retorted, "If there is someone who is being crucified, it is the politician, 
security officials, and others. If he [the patriarch] is a religious and 
spiritual leader, he should be much more cautious when making a statement. 
Someone who really loves his country has to be more responsible."[51] <> 

Bartholomew seems to have touched a raw nerve. For all its Alliance of 
Civilizations rhetoric, Erdoğan's Islamist government has maintained a tight 
stranglehold on the country's Christian institutions and blocked reforms that 
could lead to the growth of Christianity. True, the government has made some 
minor concessions to Christian institutions, including legislation that creates 
new but very limited possibilities for Christian foundations to recover some 
confiscated property, [52] <>  but this was little more than a ploy to please 
the European Union and Washington and pales into insignificance by such hostile 
measures as the refusal to reopen the Halki Theological Seminary—the only 
institution in Turkey where Orthodox clergy could be trained—before Greece and 
Bulgaria improved the conditions of their Muslim minorities.[53] <>  In other 
words, Ankara does not recognize the right of the Orthodox Church, or any other 
church for that matter, to run a theological seminary as a religious liberty 
but merely as an instrument of deal-making with Western powers for the purposes 
of enhancing the position of Islam.

Indeed, while Turkey's churches have long enjoyed freedom of worship, they have 
remained without legal status to this very day. Most of their work takes place 
in the legal framework of foundations that operate under the strict supervision 
of the General Directorate for Foundations[54] <>  and other state 
institutions—including a secret national security department whose mandate is 
to control non-Muslim minorities.[55] <>  They have, moreover, been entangled 
in labyrinthine negotiations and lengthy and expensive court cases for the 
return of confiscated property as well as permission to expand their engagement 
with society through the provision of education and other charitable activity. 
Churches have experienced grave setbacks in addition to the above mentioned 
murders, notably: The state conducted a four-year prosecution of two Turkish, 
evangelical Protestant converts from Islam on charges of "insulting 
Turkishness." Although these charges were dropped for lack of evidence in 
October 2010, the converts were forced to pay fines of $3,170 each or go to 
prison for seven months for "collecting information on citizens."[56] <> 

Ankara is taking legal action to confiscate lands that historically belonged to 
the Syriac Orthodox Monastery of Mor Gabriel (founded in 379 CE), whose bishop 
has encouraged persecuted Christian refugees to return to the area and rebuild 
their villages.[57] <> 

Less than a year before his death, Padovese was especially disappointed by the 
rejection of his appeal for the status of the Church of St. Paul in Tarsus to 
be changed from a museum to a functioning place of regular worship. Not only 
had the pope made a personal appeal in this respect, but the archbishop of 
Cologne, Cardinal Meisner, had asked Erdoğan for the return of the church "as a 
gesture of European cooperation." The Turkish media reported that Ankara turned 
down these requests from the pope, Cardinal Meisner, and Bishop Padovese, 
notwithstanding the Catholic leaders' pledge to support the building of a 
mosque in Germany on condition that the Turkish government hand over the holy 
site to the church, together with permission for the construction of a center 
for pilgrims.[58] <> 

The Islamist Erdoğan maintains continuity with his ultranationalist 
predecessors by refusing to respect the historic, ecumenical character of the 
Patriarchate of Constantinople—i.e., its titular ascendancy over the other 
patriarchates of the 300 million-strong Orthodox communion worldwide—and by 
requiring that the patriarch be a Turkish citizen by birth. Last October, the 
Turkish authorities allowed the right-wing Nationalist Movement Party to 
conduct Islamic prayers at the ancient Armenian Cathedral of the Holy Virgin at 
Ani.[59] <> 


Raging Christophobia


Padovese believed that there would be no end to the war against the church in 
Turkey until the public as a whole rejected the widely-accepted negative 
stereotypes of Christians as dangerous, subversive aliens within society, and 
he especially blamed the popular Turkish media for perpetuating a climate of 
hate. He highlighted as an example two cases involving the late Fr. Santoro. In 
the first, he was run out of a village near Trabzon by a group of children 
while local adults incited the youth with applause. The local newspaper 
reported the incident with the headline "Priest Sighted on the Coast Road," as 
if his presence there justified the mob action against him.[60] <>  The second 
case followed Santoro's murder when the daily Vatan alleged that the 
assassinated priest had been guilty of distributing money to young people to 
entice them to visit his church.[61] <> 

Turkey's Christians were especially alarmed by the mass popular hysteria 
whipped up by the 2006 blockbuster Valley of the Wolves, an action-packed 
adventure film set in post-Saddam Iraq. Reviewing the movie in Spiegel, Cem 
Özdemir—a member of the European Parliament of Turkish descent—decried its 
pandering to "racist sentiments" and its making "Christians and Jews appear as 
repugnant, conspiratorial holy warriors hoping to use blood-drenched swords to 
expand or reclaim the empire of their God."[62] <> 

Far from distancing themselves from the movie, ultra-nationalists and those at 
high levels in the Islamist camp praised it. "The film is absolutely 
magnificent … It is completely true to life," exclaimed the parliament speaker 
(and later deputy prime minister) Bülent Arınç. Unconcerned about the damaging 
implications of the film's negative images of Christians and Jews, Turkey's 
President Gül refused to condemn it, saying it was no worse than many Hollywood 
films.[63] <>  Erdoğan's pious wife is reportedly a fan of the racist film.[64] 
<> 

The Christophobia of the boulevard press and "Istanbulywood" can also be found 
in state documents. A national intelligence report, exposed by the Cumhuriyet 
newspaper in June 2005, revealed similar dangerous sentiments that are at odds 
with the principles espoused by Erdoğan at showcase Alliance of Civilizations 
events.

Titled "Reactionary Elements and Risks," the report put Islamist terrorist 
groups on a par with Christian missionaries, who, it claimed, cover Turkey 
"like a spider's web" and promote divisions in sensitive areas such as the 
Black Sea and eastern Anatolia. According to the report, the Christian 
evangelizers included Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants, as well as other 
Christian and non-Christian groups such as the Jehovah's Witnesses and the 
Baha'is, with the latter concentrating on government officials, liberal 
businessmen, and performing and other artists.[65] <> 

Echoing the tenor of the intelligence report, Turkish state minister Mehmet 
Aydın, who oversees the state's Directorate for Religious Affairs and who has 
served as an advisor to the National Security Council on religious issues, 
argued that the goal of Christian missionaries was to "break up the historical, 
religious, national, and cultural unity of the people of Turkey," adding that 
much evangelizing was "done in secret."[66] <>  This claim was echoed by 
Erdoğan's interior minister Abdülkadir Asku, who told the Turkish parliament 
that Christian missionaries exploited religious and ethnic differences and 
natural disasters to win the hearts of poor people. Having highlighted the 
secret and subversive nature of this allegedly devious effort, he noted an 
embarrassingly small success rate: 338 converts to Christianity (and six 
converts to Judaism) out of 70 million Turks during the previous seven 
years.[67] <> 


Deep Prejudice


When Erdoğan, as an Islamist opposition politician, announced in 1997 that "the 
minarets are our bayonets, the domes our helmets, the mosques our barracks and 
the faithful our army"—lines from a poem of by Ziya Gökalp, a 
nineteenth-century architect of Turkish nationalism based on a synthesis of 
Islam and Turkish ethnicity—he was not only making a statement about the role 
of Islam in promoting the interests of the Turkish state but also indicating 
the unity of religion and nationalism in Turkish perception. As historian 
Bernard Lewis explained, "One may speak of Christian Arabs—but a Christian Turk 
is an absurdity and a contradiction in terms. Even today, after thirty-five 
years of the secular republic, a non-Muslim in Turkey may be called a Turkish 
citizen, but never a Turk."[68] <> 

Much has changed in Turkey over the past half century but not the fundamental 
character of Turkish nationalism. The Turkish nation still thinks of itself in 
terms of Islam and Turkish ethnicity, leaving little scope for the full 
integration of non-Muslims into the life of the nation. Most Christians in 
Turkey belong to ethnic minorities. In the case of the Greeks and Armenians, 
they are identified in the public mind with historically hostile states. Roman 
Catholics and Protestants are linked with the Western powers that imposed 
humiliating conditions on the Ottoman Empire, notably the capitulations for the 
protection of non-Muslims and the sponsorship of Christian missionary activity.

Four academics of Turkish background have highlighted this Islamo-Turkish 
supremacism in a 2008 EU-commissioned report. They argued:

Despite laicism, the Turkish state has not been able to overcome the 
segregation of non-Muslim minorities and to integrate them into the nation as 
citizens with equal rights. While the Muslim Turks have been the "we," the 
non-Muslim minorities have been categorized as "the other"… they have been 
rather perceived as "domestic foreigners."

The authors make further observations about the prevailing concept of 
nationality in the context of the need for the state to end religious-based 
discrimination:

Notwithstanding the spirit of the founding text of the republic, the notion of 
Turkish citizenship was shaped according to the legal context that prevailed 
before the Tanzimat reforms of 1839. Although the new republic defined itself 
as a secular state, Sunni Islam has been functional in the nation-building 
process as a uniting, common cultural factor of the majority of Turkey's 
inhabitants. A person who is not a Muslim is usually referred to as a minority 
person or a Turkish citizen, but not a Turk. Turk designates an ethno-religious 
characteristic of a political community.[69] <> 

The extent to which this cultural phenomenon still influences Turkish society 
at the grassroots level is evident from the findings of an EU-financed public 
opinion survey conducted in 2008 by two Turkish scholars as a part of the 
International Social Survey Program <http://www.issp.org/> . It discovered that

*       One third of Turkish Muslims would object to having a Christian as a 
neighbor. 
*       More than half believe that Christians should not be allowed to openly 
express their religious views in printed publication or in public meetings. 
*       More than half are opposed to Christians serving in the army, security 
services, police force, and political parties. 
*       Just under half believe Christians should not be active in the 
provision of health services.[70] <>  

The road from such views to outright discrimination and a heightened threat of 
violence is very short indeed.


Conclusion


All available evidence points to the presence of important religious and 
political elements in the assassination of Bishop Padovese. If truth is to 
prevail over "pious lies"—as the archbishop of Smyrna desires—Ankara and the 
Vatican will have to cooperate to ensure a full and transparent enquiry into 
the bishop's death. The credibility of an enquiry will depend on open 
examination of the details of the murderous act itself as well as on the 
broader circumstances surrounding it, including other violent acts of 
Christophobia and the encouragement of xenophobic attitudes by the media, the 
entertainment industry, and the educational system. This means penetrating the 
netherworld of connections between the Turkish government, the deep state, and 
radical political groups, and examining the institutional sources of Turkish 
Christophobia.

Such a joint investigation, perhaps with the assistance of the deceased 
bishop's homeland, Italy, or with the United States as Turkey's most important 
ally, would be an expression of Christian-Muslim dialogue in practice. A 
government-sponsored campaign to combat Christophobia in Turkish society would 
demonstrate Turkey's commitment to bring to an end its own historic clash of 
civilizations and replace it with a strong, equitable alliance of civilizations.

In the months that have passed since Padovese's beheading, Erdoğan and his 
Islamist government have not taken such steps. This failure is a sign of a lack 
of political will to break from Turkey's historic tradition of Islamic and 
Turkish supremacism. Unless determination is publicly demonstrated, Turkey will 
entrench itself still deeper in an Ottoman-oriented Islam that is increasingly 
at odds with its Christian minorities, its former non-Muslim ally Israel, and 
the West.

The soft power of the modern papacy, with its appeals for religious liberty, 
can exercise a positive influence on Turkey and the rest of the Islamic world. 
But Islamic powers can see, as did Stalin, an absence of papal military 
divisions in the current clash of civilizations. Unless the thoroughly 
secularized nations of what was once Christendom provide firmer backbone, the 
Vatican will have little choice but to bend with the breeze.

John Eibner, chief executive officer of Christian Solidarity International-USA, 
focuses on religious and ethnic conflict, mainly in the Middle East, North-East 
Africa and Eastern Europe. He has visited these regions on numerous human 
rights fact-finding and humanitarian aid missions.

[1] <>  According to the International Religious Freedom Report 2009 
<http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2009/130299.htm> , U.S. Department of 
State, Washington D.C., there are approximately 90,000 Christians in Turkey. 
Vatican sources claim a total of 30,000 Catholics. Catholic News Agency (Rome), 
Nov. 27, 2006 
<http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/cardinal_hopes_turkey_will_be_a_cradle_of_christianity/>
 .
[2] <>  Asia News (Bangkok), June 7, 2010.
[3] <>  Daniel Pipes, "Denying [Islamist] Terrorism, 
<http://www.danielpipes.org/2396/denying-islamist-terrorism> " The New York 
Sun, Feb. 8, 2005.
[4] <>  "Remarks by President Obama to the Turkish Parliament, 
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-By-President-Obama-To-The-Turkish-Parliament>
 " in Ankara, Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, Apr. 6, 2009.
[5] <>  Bishop Luigi Padovese, presentation 
<http://www.open-speech.com/en/threads/544805-(1)-Luigi-Padovese-Christen-in-der-T%C3%BCrkei-Von-der-Wiege-des-Christentums-bis-zur-verfolgten-Minderheit>
 , St. Louis Catholic Parish, Ansbach, Germany, June 18, 2009.
[6] <>  "The Catholic Church in the Middle East: Communion and Witness 
<http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/rc_synod_doc_20100606_instrumentum-mo_en.pdf>
 . 'Now the company of those who believed were of one heart and soul' (Acts 
4:32)," Synod of Bishops, Special Assembly for the Middle East, Vatican City, 
June 6, 2010.
[7] <>  Ibid 
<http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/rc_synod_doc_20100606_instrumentum-mo_en.pdf>
 ., p. 37.
[8] <>  "Address of His Holiness Benedict XVI 
<http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2005/august/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20050820_meeting-muslims_en.html>
 ," meeting with representatives of Muslim communities, Cologne, Libreria 
Editrice Vaticana (Rome), Aug. 20, 2005.
[9] <>  "The Catholic Church in the Middle East 
<http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/rc_synod_doc_20100606_instrumentum-mo_en.pdf>
 ," pp. 10-12.
[10] <>  Ibid 
<http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/rc_synod_doc_20100606_instrumentum-mo_en.pdf>
 ., p. 44.
[11] <>  ANSA News Agency, Vatican City, June 3, 2010 
<http://www.ansa.it/web/notizie/rubriche/english/2010/06/03/visualizza_new.html_1818877254.html>
 .
[12] <>  Agence France-Presse, June 4, 2010 
<http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20100604-273705/Turkeys-Catholic-church-head-killed-suspect-held>
 .
[13] <>  Asia News, June 7, 2010. 
[14] <>  Press release, Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism, June 3, 2010.
[15] <>  CNN, June 3, 2010 
<http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/06/03/turkey.priest.killed/index.html> 
.
[16] <>  Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, statement 
<http://www.unaoc.org/repository/erdogan.pdf> , opening session, Alliance of 
Civilizations Forum, Madrid, Jan. 15, 2008.
[17] <>  Ynet News (Tel Aviv), June 1, 2010 
<http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3897404,00.html> .
[18] <>  Associated Press, June 3, 2010.
[19] <>  Radio Vatican, June 3, 2010.
[20] <>  Ibid., June 4, 2010 
<http://www.radiovaticana.org/en1/articolo.asp?c=398233> .
[21] <>  Ibid.
[22] <>  Le Figaro (Paris), Aug. 13, 2004; CatholicCulture.org, Dec. 17, 2004 
<http://www.catholicculture.org/news/features/index.cfm?recnum=34103> .
[23] <>  Inter-Press Service (Rome), Apr. 20, 2005 
<http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=28386> ; Agence France-Presse, Apr. 21, 
2005 
<http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_politics_1_21/04/2005_55458> .
[24] <>  Benedict XVI, "Faith, Reason and the University: Memories and 
Reflections 
<http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-regensburg_en.html>
 ," University of Regensburg, Sept. 12, 2006.
[25] <>  Yeni Şafak (Istanbul), Sept. 17, 2006; Middle East Media Research 
Institute (MEMRI), Special Dispatch, no. 1297 
<http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/1883.htm> , Sept. 22, 2006.
[26] <>  Ali Bardakoğlu, "The Structure, Mission and Social Function of the 
Directorate of Religious Affairs 
<http://www.turkishpolicy.com/images/stories/2004-01-evasivecrescent/TPQ2004-1-bardakoglu.pdf>
 ," accessed Dec. 31, 2010.
[27] <>  MEMRI, Special Dispatch, no. 1297 
<http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/1883.htm> , Sept. 22, 2006.
[28] <>  Ibid <http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/1883.htm> .
[29] <>  Catholic News Agency, Nov. 29, 2006 
<http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/vatican_spokesman_says_question_of_turkish_entry_into_eu_doesnt_involve_holy_see/>
 .
[30] <>  The Sunday Times (London), Nov. 29, 2006 
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article653414.ece> .
[31] <>  Today's Zaman (Istanbul), May 14, 2009 
<http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=175243> .
[32] <>  Documentation Information Catholiques Internationales (Menzingen, 
Switzerland), June 28, 2010 
<http://www.dici.org/en/news/turkey-assassination-of-the-apostolic-vicar-of-anatolia/>
 .
[33] <>  Asia News, June 10, 2010 
<http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Archbishop-of-Smyrna:-The-martyrdom-of-bishop-Padovese-we-want-the-truth-and-not-pious-lies-18639.html>
 .
[34] <>  Ibid 
<http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Archbishop-of-Smyrna:-The-martyrdom-of-bishop-Padovese-we-want-the-truth-and-not-pious-lies-18639.html>
 .
[35] <>  Gareth H. Jenkins, "Between Fact and Fiction: Turkey's Ergenekon 
Investigation 
<http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/docs/silkroadpapers/0908Ergenekon.pdf> ," 
Silk Road paper, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Johns Hopkins University, 
Washington, D.C., Aug. 2009; H. Akim Ünver, "Turkey's 'Deep-State' and the 
Ergenekon Conundrum," The Middle East Institute, Policy Brief, no. 23, Apr. 
2009.
[36] <>  Michael Rubin, "Erdoğan, Ergenekon, and the Struggle for Turkey 
<http://www.michaelrubin.org/1107/erdogan-ergenekon-and-the-struggle-for-turkey>
 ," Mideast Monitor, Aug. 8, 2008.
[37] <>  Today's Zaman, Nov. 22, 2008 
<http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=159476> , Jan. 
17, 2009 <http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=164331> 
, Apr. 13, 2010 
<http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=207264> .
[38] <>  Reuters, Oct. 4, 2007 
<http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKL0454885220071004> .
[39] <>  Catholic News Service, Feb. 6, 2006 
<http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0600695.htm> .
[40] <>  Asia News, Feb. 7, 2006 
<http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Nuncio-in-Turkey-:-there-is-a-master-mind-behind-all-of-this-5325.html>
 .
[41] <>  BBC News, Feb. 4, 2008 <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7225889.stm> 
.
[42] <>  Today's Zaman, June 5, 2010 
<http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-212198-dink-family-lawyer-hakan-karadag-found-dead-in-his-apartment.html>
 .
[43] <>  Rubin, "Erdodgan, Ergenekon and the Struggle for Turkey 
<http://www.michaelrubin.org/1107/erdogan-ergenekon-and-the-struggle-for-turkey>
 ."
[44] <>  Ahmet Igduygu, Sule Toktas, and Bayram Ali Soner, "The Politics of 
Population in a Nation-building Process: Emigration of Non-Muslims from 
Turkey," Ethnic and Racial Studies, Feb. 2008, p. 363.
[45] <>  Ünver, "Turkey's 'Deep-State' and the Ergenekon Conundrum."
[46] <>  Asia News, Feb. 9, 2006 
<http://www.asianews.it/view4print.php?l=en&art=5352> ; BBC News, July 2, 2006 
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5139408.stm> .
[47] <>  Voice of America, Dec. 16, 2007 
<http://voanews.com/english/news/a-13-2007-12-16-voa40.html?refresh=1> .
[48] <>  Behnan Konutgan, "Christians Still Second-class Citizens under Turkish 
Secularism 
<http://www.worldevangelicals.org/lausanne/data/resources/IJRF_2009_Vol_2_Issue_1.pdf>
 ," International Journal for Religious Freedom, 1 (2009): 99-110; Compass 
Direct News, Dec. 4, 2009 
<http://www.compassdirect.org/english/country/turkey/12322/> .
[49] <>  60 Minutes, CBS, Dec. 17, 2009 
<http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/12/17/60minutes/main5990390.shtml> .
[50] <>  Today's Zaman, Dec. 22, 2009 
<http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-196263-100-gul-backs-ministers-criticism-of-patriarch-bartholomew.html>
 .
[51] <>  Hürriyet (Istanbul), Dec. 21, 2009 
<http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=ankara-awaits-clarification-from-patriarch-2009-12-21>
 .
[52] <>  Otmar Oehring, "Turkey: What Difference Does the Latest Foundations 
Law Make? <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=1100> " Forum 18 
(Oslo), Mar. 13, 2008.
[53] <>  Hürriyet, Dec. 21, 2009 
<http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=ankara-awaits-clarification-from-patriarch-2009-12-21>
 .
[54] <>  Orphan Kemal Cengiz, "Minority Foundations in Turkey: From Past To 
Future 
<http://www.todayszaman.com/columnists-213210-minority-foundations-in-turkey-from-past-to-future-1.html>
 ," part 1, Today's Zaman, June 16, 2010, part 2 
<http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/columnists-213431-minority-foundations-in-turkey-from-past-to-future-2.html>
 , June 18, 2010.
[55] <>  "Religious Freedom in Turkey: Situation of Religious Minorities," 
European Parliament, Directorate General External Policies of the Union, Policy 
Department External Policies, Luxembourg, Feb. 2008, p. 10.
[56] <>  Compass Direct News, May 28, 2010 
<http://www.compassdirect.org/english/country/turkey/20933/> .
[57] <>  The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 7, 2009 
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123638477632658147.html> .
[58] <>  Catholic News Service, Aug. 3, 2009; Hürriyet, Aug. 6, 2009 
<http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=vatican-chides-turkey-over-church-decision-2009-08-06>
 .
[59] <>  Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Oct. 1, 2010 
<http://www.rferl.org/content/Turkey_Approves_Muslim_Prayer_Service_In_Armenian_Church_/2173479.html>
 .
[60] <>  Asia News, Feb. 8, 2006 
<http://www.asianews.it/view4print.php?1=en&art=5340> .
[61] <>  Ibid., Mar. 14, 2006 
<http://www.asianews.it/view4print.php?1=eng&art=5628> .
[62] <>  Spiegel Online (Hamburg), Feb. 22, 2006.
[63] <>  The Times (London), Feb. 17, 2006 
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/european_football/article731727.ece>
 .
[64] <>  Deutsche Welle (Bonn), Feb. 20, 2006 
<http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,1909933,00.html> .
[65] <>  Compass Direct News, June 22, 2005 
<http://wwrn.org/articles/17522/?&place=europe§ion=gov-reports> .
[66] <>  Forum 18, July 10, 2007 
<http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=990> .
[67] <>  Compass Direct News, June 22, 2005.
[68] <>  Bernard Lewis, The Emergence of Modern Turkey (London: Oxford 
University Press, 1961), p. 15.
[69] <>  "Religious Freedom in Turkey. Situation of Religious Minorities," pp. 
2, 10.
[70] <>  Compass Direct News, Dec. 4, 2009; Hürriyet, Nov. 17, 2009 
<http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=8216religion-loves-tolerance-but-is-not-tolerant8217-2009-11-17>
 .

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to