http://www.newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/super-emp-emp-northkorea-nuke/2011/06/16/id/400260

 


Newsmax


North Korea Tests 'Super-EMP' Nuke 


Thursday, June 16, 2011 09:05 AM

By: Ken Timmerman

Gary Samore, a top Obama administration national security official, warned of 
new sanctions if North Korea conducted a third round of nuclear tests on 
Monday, as reports surfaced that North Korea has miniaturized its nuclear 
warheads so they can be delivered by ballistic missile.

North Korea’s last round of tests, conducted in May 2009, appear to have 
included a “super-EMP” weapon, capable of emitting enough gamma rays to disable 
the electric power grid across most of the lower 48 states, says Dr. Peter 
Vincent Pry, a former CIA nuclear weapons analyst and president of EMPact 
America, a citizens lobbying group.

Samore, who handles arms control and non-proliferation issues, warned that 
“additional strong sanctions will be imposed on the North with the support of 
Russia and China."

North Korea’s nuclear tests have been dismissed as failures by some analysts 
because of their low explosive yield. But Dr. Pry believes they bore the 
“signature” of the Russian-designed “super-EMP” weapon, capable of emitting 
more gamma radiation than a 25-megaton nuclear weapon. 

Pry believes the U.S. intelligence community was expecting North Korea to test 
a first generation implosion device with an explosive yield of 10 to 20 
kilotons, similar to the bomb the U.S. exploded over Nagasaki in 1945. He said, 
“So when they saw one that put off just three kilotons, they said it failed. 
That is so implausible." 

The technology for producing a first generation implosion weapon has been 
around since 1945, and is thoroughly described in open source literature. 

South Korean defense minister, Kim Kwan-jin, told his country’s parliament on 
Monday that North Korea had succeeded in miniaturizing its nuclear weapons 
design, allowing them to place a nuclear warhead on a ballistic missile.

His analysis coincided with Congressional testimony in March by Lt. Gen. Ronald 
L. Burgess, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, who stated that North 
Korea “may now have several plutonium-based warheads that it can deliver by 
ballistic missiles.”

The Soviet Union conducted an atmospheric test of an EMP weapon in 1962 over 
Kazakhstan whose pulse wave set on fire a power station 300 kilometers away and 
destroyed it within 10 seconds.

Such a weapon — equal to a massive solar flare such as the “solar maxima” 
predicted by NASA to occur in 2012 — poses “substantial risk to equipment and 
operation of the nation’s power grid and under extreme conditions could result 
in major long term electrical outages,” said Joseph McClelland of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission in Senate testimony last month.

Pry said that a group of Russian nuclear weapons scientists approached him in 
2004 when he served as staff director of the Commission to Assess the Threat to 
the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, to warn the United 
States that the technology to make that weapon “had leaked” to North Korea, and 
possibly to Iran.

“They told us that Russian scientists had gone to North Korea to work on 
building the super-EMP weapon,” Pry told Newsmax. “The North Koreans appear to 
have tested it in 2006 and again in 2009.”

North Korea’s main partner in its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile 
programs is Iran. Dr. William Graham, chairman of the Commission to Assess the 
Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, warned 
Congress three years ago that Iran had conducted missile launches in an EMP 
mode, detonating them high in the atmosphere.

Read more on Newsmax.com:  
<http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/iran-nuclear-plan/2008/07/29/id/324724#ixzz1O4Ro0WKT>
 "U.S. Intel: Iran Plans Nuclear Strike on U.S."  

Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., has introduced legislation known as the SHIELD Act 
that would require U.S. utilities to harden large transformers and other key 
elements of the nation’s power grid to protect them from a devastating EMP 
attack or a geomagnetic storm.

The House last year passed a similar measure by unanimous consent, but the bill 
died in the Senate, where Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D, N.M., and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, 
R-Ariz., the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy Committee, insisted 
that the threat from cyberattack was more dangerous than the possibility of an 
EMP strike or a solar flare.

John Kappenman, the chief science adviser to the EMP commission, believes it 
would require just $1 billion to harden an estimated 5,000 power transformers 
around the country to shield them from the impact of an EMP-like event.

“We built this infrastructure without any awareness of this threat,” he told 
Newsmax. “We have no design code that takes this threat into account. We’ve 
been doing everything to design the grid to make it greatly more coupled, and 
therefore more vulnerable, to this threat.”

He compared the national power grid to a series of giant skyscrapers, “and only 
now we’ve discovered that it’s located on a big fault line.”

President Obama’s science adviser, John Holdren, warned in a March 10, 2011 
Op-Ed co-authored with his British counterpart of the potentially catastrophic 
impact of a solar maxima event in the next 12 to 18 months.

“Space weather can affect human safety and economies anywhere on our vast wired 
planet, and blasts of electrically-charged gas traveling from the Sun at up to 
5 million miles an hour can strike with little warning,” Holdren wrote. “Their 
impact could be big — on the order of $2 trillion during the first year in the 
United States alone, with a recovery period of 4 to 10 years.”

Rep. Trent Franks, who authored the SHIELD Act, warned of “catastrophic 
consequences” should Congress fail to act.

“The U.S. society and economy are so critically dependent upon the availability 
of electricity that a significant collapse of the grid, precipitated by a major 
natural or man-made EMP event, could result in catastrophic civilian 
casualties,” he said. “This vulnerability, if left unaddressed, could have 
grave, societal altering consequences.”





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to