http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0611/carter_winning.php3
June 27, 2011 / 25 Sivan, 5771
Lost in Afghanistan?
By Stephen L. Carter
http://american3p.org/wp-content/uploads/soldiers.jpg
A Yale University law professor argues that Obama would rather not talk
about military victory. And that choice is as telling as it is troubling
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Did we win? The question came to mind
after President Obama, in a prime-time address, announced a plan to draw
down American forces from Afghanistan from 100,000 today to 90,000 at the
end of the year and about 70,000 by the summer of 2012. He confirmed his
earlier insistence that the combat mission will be completed by 2014. The
president promised to bring the troops home, and he is carrying out that
promise. But did we win? Are they coming home because they did the job? Or
has the enormous sacrifice of blood and treasure been for naught?
The president spoke not of victory but of goals achieved and commitments
fulfilled. That is the language of contemporary diplomacy and scholarship.
Among sophisticates, the concept of winning wars seems so 1980s; perhaps
even 1940s.
Many historians trace the reluctance to embrace the concept of victory to
the Cold War, when the horror of mutually assured destruction meant that
winning in the traditional sense was impossible. Thus the role of the
military was re-imagined, encompassing, as Thomas C. Schelling memorably
wrote in Arms and Influence, less victory than "the bargaining power that
comes from its capacity to hurt." Indeed, although the point is often
forgotten, the Cold War was the heyday of a pragmatic vision of foreign
policy. The dominant public intellectuals of the day - Arthur Schlesinger
Jr. is one exemplar - proposed that American liberalism was about solving
problems as they arose, not implementing grand theories. Such world-changing
dreams belonged to a discredited "messianic" age. The experiences of Korea
and Vietnam seemed to confirm this philosophy.
Except that, in the end, we did win the Cold War. And we have been winning
ever since. The historian Paul Johnson has suggested that Americans are the
only people on earth who, when a war begins, always expect to win; we so
take the result for granted, says Johnson, that we do not even realize how
unusual our expectation is. Indeed, with the exception of Somalia, to find
anything like an American defeat one would have to go back to our swift
withdrawal from Lebanon after the truck bombing of the Marine barracks in
1983. Other than that, we have won them all.
No doubt our success rate leads to a swagger we ourselves scarcely notice.
Consider Matty, the disillusioned nuclear-weapons researcher in Don
DeLillo's brilliant novel Underworld. Matty not only rooted for the boorish
Bobby Fischer in his 1972 world chess championship match with Boris Spassky
but also "identified with the public tantrums, all the rude demands.the open
show of bitterness when he lost." Matty, in a sense, makes Johnson's point.
Like Bobby Fischer, we expect to win them all; like Fischer, when we don't,
we look for somebody to blame.
In short, whatever the fashionable language of the day, we Americans do not
much like fighting merely to achieve commitments and goals. We like to win.
There is a fair argument to be made that we won in Iraq - a proposition that
might be admitted even by those of us who wonder whether it was worth the
price. We toppled the regime with surprising ease (crushing a 400,000-man
Army along the way), then dragged Saddam Hussein from his hole in the
ground. We left in place a democracy that, although struggling, seems likely
to survive.
In Afghanistan, we plainly won the first war - toppling the Taliban in mere
weeks - and President Obama should not be reluctant to say so. But we have
grown weary of the longer conflict to keep the Taliban from returning to
power. If Obama truly believes the time has come for the fighting to stop,
perhaps he should be guided by the example of Dwight D. Eisenhower, who
famously proclaimed during World War II that there is no substitute for
victory, then accepted a bitter stalemate in Korea. But he demanded a signed
armistice first, and left a massive American force in place to guard the
uneasy peace.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com
osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
