http://news.yahoo.com/twitters-hands-off-approach-tweeted-terrorism-16162658
2.html


Twitter's Hands-Off Approach to Tweeted Terrorism


By Adam Clark Estes | The Atlantic Wire - 3 hrs ago

On Friday, hackers broke into the main Twitter account for NBC News and
reported
<http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/09/nbc-newss-twitter-account
-quickly-pulled-after-911-hack/42314/>  a terrorist attack on Ground Zero.
Twitter acted fast, pulling the accounts of NBC and the Script Kiddies, the
LulzSec-lookalikes that took credit for the attack, but the tweet stirred
some anxiety in the days before the tenth anniversary of 9/11. This is
hardly the first time
<http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/07/fox-news-twitter-hacked-a
nnounces-obama-killed-iowa/39553/>  that rogue tweets have stirred fear, and
Twitter is drawing an increasing amount of scrutiny
<http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/08/twitter-braces-censorship-fol
lowing-uk-riots/41127/>  for the potential dangers of people using the
service to incite violence. There are also new details about how the NBC
News account was hacked in the first place (hint: don't click on mysterious
files that strange emailers send you). All in all, though, the burgeoning
social media company has not always been so quick to address the
misinformation. Twitter is a boon for free speech around the world, but
considering the security problems, it's also struggling with the
consequences of free speech left unchecked.

The NBC News breach could've happened to anyone. MSNBC reports
<http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44464766/ns/us_news-security/#.Tm3lM7_i4X0>
that Ryan Osborne, NBC's director of social media, received some suspicious
emails in the days before the attack and, probably out of simple curiosity,
opened an attachment that might have infected his computer with a Trojan
horse. Once installed, this type of spyware can nab passwords by recording
keyboard strokes. With a stolen password from Osborne, all the Script
Kiddies would have been able to take control of the account and tweet about
terrorism or anything else they liked. The F.B.I. is meanwhile investigating
the hack, but a government official told MSNBC, "The truth is it's
relatively easy to get into these accounts."

Twitter doesn't exactly deflect the blame, it's certainly not shouldering
the responsibility for security breaches. We reached out to Twitter to ask
how the company protects its users, especially news outlets with large
followings, against security breaches. Twitter spokesperson Lynn Fox told
The Atlantic Wire that it doesn't comment on individual user accounts and
directed us to an official blog post on "Keeping your account safe
<http://blog.twitter.com/2011/07/keeping-your-account-safe.html> ." We then
asked in an email if it would be safe to say that Twitter entrusts the
security of individual accounts to the users who own the accounts. "I
wouldn't say that," Fox replied and directed us to the last paragraph of
that same blog post, that points to Twitter's account security help page and
"an excellent safety and security checklist
<http://media.twitter.com/newsrooms/security> ," which gives some good tips
for users but says nothing about what the company does to prevent malevolent
uses of accounts.

The company has been similarly dismissive about a recent flare-up of
criticism over the misuse of Twitter in the London riots and violence in
Mexico. Last week, news emerged about two "Twitter terrorists" who sent out
false reports about attacks on a school in the Mexican city of Veracruz now
face 30 years in prison
<http://articles.cnn.com/2011-09-07/world/mexico.twitter.analysts_1_social-m
edia-twitter-and-facebook-twitter-post/3?_s=PM:WORLD> . When we asked,
Twitter would not comment on the specifics of that case. 

"Our users' ability to express themselves is important to us and that
freedom of expression is recognized internationally as a fundamental human
right," Twitter said in a statement. "Our users' ability to express
themselves is important to us and that freedom of expression is recognized
internationally as a fundamental human right. Of course, we neither condone
nor allow illegal content on Twitter and we evaluate reports on accounts
that may violate our Terms of Service."

That leaves a difficult problem, because it's a very new one. Societies
around the world are struggling to cope with the powerful effects of Twitter
and other social media. However, it's a process of trial and error to
determine exactly how Twitter ought to improve their service and at which
point governments should intervene with regulation. In the United States,
the First Amendment is guiding dogma, but in countries like Britain,
governments have threatened
<http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/08/twitter-braces-censorship-fol
lowing-uk-riots/41127/>  to censor social media in times of crisis.

Does Twitter have a security problem? Probably, but it's not as bad as it
used to be
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/16/twitter-security-https_n_836413.ht
ml> . Are governments overreacting to the perceived threat of social media
and the unbridled free speech they enable? It would certainly seem so. Is
there anything you can do about either of those problems? Yes: Be careful.
Be careful what you tweet; be careful with your password; and above all, be
careful what you believe when you read it on Twitter.

"Once people were yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater," Ryan Calo, a
researcher at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, told
<http://articles.cnn.com/2011-09-07/world/mexico.twitter.analysts_1_social-m
edia-twitter-and-facebook-twitter-post?_s=PM:WORLD>  CNN regarding the case
in Mexico. "Now the whole world is like the crowded theater."

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to