On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Jim <jim.w.matth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Here is the backtrace from GDB, but I am not sure that tells much more than
> mdb had?
>

It's a tool I'm more familiar with. I don't get much of an opportunity
to use niche systems these days.

I'd consider tossing the following into log.c before the fprintf to
see if it gives anymore info;

 merror(_fflog,
            "%d %s %02d %s %s%s%s %s %s %s:%s->%s:%s\n",
            lf->year,
            lf->mon,
            lf->day,
            lf->hour,
            lf->hostname != lf->location?lf->hostname:"",
            lf->hostname != lf->location?"->":"",
            lf->location,
            lf->action,
            lf->protocol,
            lf->srcip,
            lf->srcport,
            lf->dstip,
            lf->dstport);


Also, do you have any rules or anything looking at the firewall logs?

Hopefully one of the actual developers will take a look at this and
just know what's going on.

> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0  0xfed95b9c in strlen () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0xfed95b9c in strlen () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
> #1  0xfedf0f82 in _ndoprnt () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
> #2  0xfedf3b09 in fprintf () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
> #3  0x08076d0d in FW_Log (lf=0x81c0558) at log.c:261
> #4  0x08057530 in OS_ReadMSG (m_queue=6) at analysisd.c:860
> #5  0x08056f45 in main (argc=1, argv=0x8047dcc) at analysisd.c:527
>
> Any idea what is causing this?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --JIM
>
> On Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:54:43 AM UTC-4, dan (ddpbsd) wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Jim <jim.w.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Any further thoughts on fixing this core dump problem?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> >
>> > --JIM
>> >
>>
>> Is there any chance you can run it in gdb?
>>
>> gdb /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd
>> set follow-fork-mode child
>> run
>> *CRASH*
>> bt
>>
>>
>> There are probably other things you should be running in addition to
>> bt, but I don't know it all that well.
>>
>> >
>> > On Monday, August 13, 2012 7:41:39 PM UTC-4, Jim wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Here are the logs from the ossec.log, which was running in debug.
>> >> Which
>> >> reports until you can see analysisd core dumps.  IPs and hostnames have
>> >> been
>> >> changed from the original...
>> >>
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:09 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:08 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:07.674864 e1000g0
>> >> @0:63 p 192.168.2.81,46618 -> 192.168.2.205,994 PR tcp len 20 142 -AP
>> >> IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:09 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:08 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:07.675807 e1000g0
>> >> @0:63 p 192.168.2.81,46618 -> 192.168.2.205,994 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:09 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:08 batch.local1 batch kernel: VFS: busy inodes on changed
>> >> media or resized disk hdb'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:09 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:08 n58.local1 ntpd[2816]: kernel time sync enabled 0001'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:09 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:09 n44.local1 smartd[2942]: Device: /dev/sda, 661
>> >> Currently
>> >> unreadable (pending) sectors '
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:10 FW1.local1 kernel: ACCEPTED IN=eth0 OUT=eth4
>> >> SRC=192.168.1.200 DST=172.16.4.34 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=252
>> >> ID=27140
>> >> PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0 ID=16044 SEQ=0 '
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:10 batch.local1 batch kernel: VFS: busy inodes on changed
>> >> media or resized disk hdb'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:11 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:10.875337 e1000g0
>> >> @0:60 p 192.168.4.52,49168 -> 192.168.2.205,6667 PR tcp len 20 72 -AP
>> >> IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:11 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:10.876005 e1000g0
>> >> @0:60 p 192.168.4.52,49168 -> 192.168.2.205,6667 PR tcp len 20 52 -A
>> >> IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:11 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:11.071610 e1000g0
>> >> @0:63 p 192.168.2.127,56476 -> 192.168.2.205,994 PR tcp len 20 142 -AP
>> >> IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:11 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:11.074955 e1000g0
>> >> @0:63 p 192.168.2.127,56476 -> 192.168.2.205,994 PR tcp len 20 52 -A
>> >> IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:11 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:11.140966 e1000g0
>> >> @0:63 p 192.168.2.81,46618 -> 192.168.2.205,994 PR tcp len 20 126 -AP
>> >> IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:11 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:11 casrv9-hidn.local1 ipmon[123]: 15:07:11.142122 e1000g0
>> >> @0:63 p 192.168.2.81,46618 -> 192.168.2.205,994 PR tcp len 20 52 -A IN'
>> >> 2012/08/12 15:07:13 ossec-logcollector: DEBUG: Reading syslog message:
>> >> 'Aug 12 15:07:12 loghost unix: NOTICE: core_log: ossec-analysisd[713]
>> >> core
>> >> dumped: /var/cores/core.ossec-analysisd.713'
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> And here is the firewall log from ossec.  I can see that these messages
>> >> stop before the above messages:
>> >>
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:06:57 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.4.142:45755->192.168.2.205:994
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:06:59 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.4.142:45755->192.168.2.205:994
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:06:59 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.4.127:58951->192.168.2.205:994
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:06:59 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.4.127:58951->192.168.2.205:994
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:07:01 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.15.70:53959->192.168.2.205:994
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:07:01 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.15.70:53959->192.168.2.205:994
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:07:05 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.4.61:49195->192.168.2.205:6667
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:07:05 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.4.61:49195->192.168.2.205:6667
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:07:09 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.2.81:46618->192.168.2.205:994
>> >> 2012 Aug 12 15:07:09 casrv9-hidn.local1->/var/adm/systemlog ALLOW tcp
>> >> 192.168.2.81:46618->192.168.2.205:994
>> >>
>> >> Last couple of lines in firewall log match the first couple of lines in
>> >> the ossec.log snippet.  I am guessing things went bad after the last
>> >> entry
>> >> reported in the firewall log?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --JIM
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Monday, August 13, 2012 3:03:53 PM UTC-4, JB wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Seg fault occurred at ./analysisd/alerts/log.c around line 261:
>> >>>     fprintf(_fflog,
>> >>>             "%d %s %02d %s %s%s%s %s %s %s:%s->%s:%s\n",
>> >>>             lf->year,
>> >>>             lf->mon,
>> >>>             lf->day,
>> >>>             lf->hour,
>> >>>             lf->hostname != lf->location?lf->hostname:"",
>> >>>             lf->hostname != lf->location?"->":"",
>> >>>             lf->location,
>> >>>             lf->action,
>> >>>             lf->protocol,
>> >>>             lf->srcip,
>> >>>             lf->srcport,
>> >>>             lf->dstip,
>> >>>             lf->dstport);
>> >>>
>> >>> Could you provide some Solaris firewall raw log entries prior to the
>> >>> time
>> >>> of this core dump?
>> >>> Also, provide same OSSEC firewall log entries (e.g.,
>> >>> /var/ossec/logs/fiewwall/2012/Aug/oosec-firewall-12.log).
>> >>> It seems one of the lf-> fields was null but I do not know which one
>> >>> yet.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sunday, August 12, 2012 12:19:23 PM UTC-7, Jim wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I am trying to get OSSEC version 2.6 running on one of our Solaris 10
>> >>>> loghosts but I am running into a problem where analysisd cores after
>> >>>> about a
>> >>>> minute.  It will actually report some e-mail alerts for a minute or
>> >>>> so
>> >>>> before analysisd cores.  Below is an MDeBug of the core file:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ******************************************************************************
>> >>>>   Application core Dump Analysis Output                     MDeBug
>> >>>> Rev
>> >>>> 1.0
>> >>>>   Sun Aug 12 15:13:15 EDT 2012                   Files:
>> >>>> /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd  core.ossec-analysisd.713
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ******************************************************************************
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>                 ** Core file status **
>> >>>>                 ------------------------
>> >>>> debugging core file of ossec-analysisd (32-bit) from ex
>> >>>> file: /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd
>> >>>> initial argv: /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd -d -d
>> >>>> threading model: multi-threaded
>> >>>> status: process terminated by SIGSEGV (Segmentation Fault)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>                 ** Thread stack($c) **
>> >>>>                 ----------------------
>> >>>> libc.so.1`strlen+0xc(8095e28, 8046478, 80bbc10, 0)
>> >>>> libc.so.1`fprintf+0x99(80bbc10, 8095e08, 7dc, 81b31f2, c, 81b31e8)
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x38e(81b3178, 81b3178, 8046500, 805763c)
>> >>>> OS_ReadMSG+0x5d0(4, 808d48b, 2c9, 808d46b)
>> >>>> main+0x98a(3, 8047db0, 8047dc0)
>> >>>> _start+0x80(3, 8047e74, 8047e93, 8047e96, 0, 8047e99)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>                 ** Shared objects **
>> >>>>                 ----------------------
>> >>>>     BASE    LIMIT     SIZE NAME
>> >>>>  8050000  80a8000    58000 /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd
>> >>>> fef90000 fef9b000     b000 /lib/libsocket.so.1
>> >>>> feef0000 fef71000    81000 /lib/libnsl.so.1
>> >>>> feea0000 feed6000    36000 /lib/libresolv.so.2
>> >>>> fed70000 fee7e000   10e000 /lib/libc.so.1
>> >>>> fefc3000 fefeb000    28000 /lib/ld.so.1
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>                 Thread stack for MT app
>> >>>>                 ------------------------
>> >>>> stack pointer for thread 1: 8046440
>> >>>> [ 08046440 libc.so.1`strlen+0xc() ]
>> >>>>   08046468 libc.so.1`fprintf+0x99()
>> >>>>   080464c8 FW_Log+0x38e()
>> >>>>   08047d28 OS_ReadMSG+0x5d0()
>> >>>>   08047d8c main+0x98a()
>> >>>>   08047da4 _start+0x80()
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Then a disassembly of FW_log.  Let me know if you need me to dig
>> >>>> deeper
>> >>>> here...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> bash-3.00# mdb /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd
>> >>>> core.ossec-analysisd.713
>> >>>> Loading modules: [ libc.so.1 ld.so.1 ]
>> >>>> > ::stack
>> >>>> libc.so.1`strlen+0xc(8095e28, 8046478, 80bbc10, 0)
>> >>>> libc.so.1`fprintf+0x99(80bbc10, 8095e08, 7dc, 81b31f2, c, 81b31e8)
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x38e(81b3178, 81b3178, 8046500, 805763c)
>> >>>> OS_ReadMSG+0x5d0(4, 808d48b, 2c9, 808d46b)
>> >>>> main+0x98a(3, 8047db0, 8047dc0)
>> >>>> _start+0x80(3, 8047e74, 8047e93, 8047e96, 0, 8047e99)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > FW_Log+0x38e::dis
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x36b:                   movl   0x8(%ebp),%eax
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x36e:                   pushl  0x68(%eax)
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x371:                   movl   0x8(%ebp),%eax
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x374:                   addl   $0x7a,%eax
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x377:                   pushl  %eax
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x378:                   movl   0x8(%ebp),%eax
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x37b:                   pushl  0x6c(%eax)
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x37e:                   pushl  $0x8095e08
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x383:                   pushl  0x80c068c
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x389:                   call   -0x20f6c
>> >>>> <PLT=libc.so.1`fprintf>
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x38e:                   addl   $0x40,%esp
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x391:                   subl   $0xc,%esp
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x394:                   pushl  0x80c068c
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x39a:                   call   -0x20e5d
>> >>>> <PLT=libc.so.1`fflush>
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x39f:                   addl   $0x10,%esp
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x3a2:                   movl   $0x1,-0x8(%ebp)
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x3a9:                   movl   -0x8(%ebp),%eax
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x3ac:                   movl   -0x4(%ebp),%ebx
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x3af:                   leave
>> >>>> FW_Log+0x3b0:                   ret
>> >>>> mknod:                          pushl  %ebp
>> >>>> > ::quit
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --JIM

Reply via email to