Don't thank me yet, you may actually get the job ;0 heheheheheh

---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com


On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Heinrich Breedt <heinrichbre...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks scott,
> really appreciate your comments and will def take them to heart
> (wow, from mistake comes some real good after all :) )
>
> On 6/1/11, Scott Barnes <scott.bar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Resumes are part factual evidence and part information architecture. The
> > purpose for you in this case with Microsoft is to somehow get past the
> > recruitment side of things and into the hands of a blue badge (your
> future
> > boss) who's probably going to have a mixed approach to reading resumes
> ...
> >  (ie to this day i have no idea how i got hired at Microsoft when i did -
> so
> > take this as a former blue badger who read resumes often as just one guys
> > opinion).
> >
> >
> >    1. *Embrace the concept of more than one column*. Summary of expertise
> >    needs better spacing between paragraphs and you need to provide
> > highlights.
> >    The objective here is to show bit of leg, but not give away the entire
> >    prize. Tease the person into wanting to get you into the interview to
> > know
> >    more. Its a dangerous posture to take, but ultimately its always going
> to
> > be
> >    a crap shoot.
> >
> >    2. *Don't be afraid to rip out the highlighter :)* ... inside
> Microsoft
> >    we had this problem around excess information..everyone is hitting you
> > 24/7
> >    with "must read"...you enjoy reading an email / document as much as a
> > swift
> >    kick in the head. I found huge wins by just highlighting data points
> in
> >    anything i sent around ...as then its a case of "blah blah blah You
> need
> >    to focus on this blah blah blah" its not "traditional" when it comes
> to
> >    resume transactions but if you want someones attention....then grab
> it.
> >
> >    3. *Skills & Employment History. *You've told me upfront you have xyz
> >    technologies but levels? these days most resumes i have seen etc have
> >    "advanced, intermediate, specialist etc" type leveling. You're wanting
> to
> >    tell the person looking at the resume your strengths and weaknesses.
> > We'll
> >    get to the testing of those levels later in the interview process, for
> > now
> >    i'll take your word upfront ..  Cite them once and move on. Don't
> re-list
> >    them again in the area's of where you worked, its redundant and
> honestly
> > the
> >    person(s) reading the resume are unlikely to map the relevance. Pick 5
> > major
> >    project highlights and thats it, list the brands you worked for but
> given
> >    the visibility of most devs these days don't be afraid to put 1995
> -2002
> >    (Upon Request). in there somewhere. As its expected behavior in IT to
> > have a
> >    resume thats quite long given the contract arrangements these days.
> Also
> >    tell us what you did not the problems they had..ie i couldn't find
> where
> > you
> >    fit into GIS System you worked on.. sounds interesting, but what role
> did
> >    you play? that sort of thing. 25 words or less per item btw.
> >
> >    4. *Fonts*. Your all over the place with your text sizes. Keep a
> >    consistent flow, leverage MS Word Heading1, Heading2 etc. Don't make
> them
> > to
> >    big either 12pt max with secondary text being around 10pt to give the
> > reader
> >    balance. Use bold to sparingly more to highlight a new area of focus
> (ie
> >    like this email i guess). Allows readers to skim read if need be.
> >
> >    5. *References etc*. Upon Request. Firstly it removes the page count
> and
> >    secondly its a fishing expedition at times when hunting for jobs, so
> them
> >    having to ask you for who the references are shows they are
> >    interested...nothing like a "oh so you read it, good".
> >
> > Layering is the key imho. You're a product so you need to sell yourself
> as
> > one and a good healthy resume feels like you are just doing that - about
> to
> > make a great acquisition. You want the cover to be eye catching but when
> you
> > turn it around basically you want a feature break down of what's
> > inside...this is what you're about to buy. Take a slice from Apple's
> product
> > marketing (as weird as this may sound) they give you just enough but not
> to
> > much information. Layer in your message about who you are, what you can
> do,
> > how often you do it and what you want to do next. An example would be
> start
> > at 100+ words for a description of what you did at a role etc, then scale
> it
> > back to 50, then back to 25... why 25? why not... :D
> >
> > Anyway, Good luck! :) and MCS is an interesting area to dwell in... bring
> > thickskin and an open mind hehehe...
> >
> > ---
> > Regards,
> > Scott Barnes
> > http://www.riagenic.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Heinrich Breedt
> > <heinrichbre...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> I honestly would not know how to cut it down to 2 pages.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> Heinrich Breedt
>
> “Do not wait to strike till the iron is hot; but make it hot by
> striking.” - William B. Sprague
>

Reply via email to