So if they are push Sharepoint Online, does that mean there was a Sharepoint Offline? Or is this another example of where Online means "In the cloud" versus self hosted. No need to answer, being facetious.
Native implementations is only going to mean more jobs for developers, right? On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 at 10:55 Grant Maw <grant....@gmail.com> wrote: > I with Ken on this - if the bell is starting to toll for Sharepoint, what > alternatives are being used? > > I've never liked Sharepoint, it always seemed to me to be an ugly, > bloated, cumbersome thing to use, so I for one won't weep if it's nearing > the end of its life, but there must be some alternative that is filling the > void, shouldn't there? > > On 3 November 2015 at 09:58, Greg Low (罗格雷格博士) <g...@greglow.com> wrote: > >> There really is quite a shift going on. >> >> >> >> For years, every time we asked for enhancements to the portals in SQL >> Server Reporting Services, etc. the response was that “we already have a >> portal business and it’s called SharePoint”. Now all the SQL Server >> directions are away from SharePoint, back to native implementations. >> >> >> >> Even most of my SharePoint friends are mostly pushing SharePoint Online >> now. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> Dr Greg Low >> >> >> >> 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 >> fax >> >> SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com >> >> >> >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: >> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Schaefer >> *Sent:* Tuesday, 3 November 2015 10:30 AM >> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> >> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Office 365 >> >> >> >> Of course. But the “who uses SharePoint?” question kinda implies that >> SharePoint’s been superseded in all areas that it does (document storage, >> workflow, calendaring, collaboration etc.). So, I’m not asking for a ERP >> system, or a CRM or something that people might have shoe-horned into >> SharePoint before. But just looking at SharePoint’s core functionality >> (document lists, Office integration, AD integration etc.), is there >> anything that people are flocking to now that is, arguably, superior to the >> way SharePoint works (whether it be scalability, ease of use, >> extensibility, 3rd party add-in support, whatever) >> >> >> >> I realise this is a bit vague, but I’ve only just started on this, so I >> haven’t yet compiled a list of requirements yet. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [ >> mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Michael Ridland >> *Sent:* Monday, 2 November 2015 2:25 PM >> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Office 365 >> >> >> >> >> >> Wouldn't this all depend on your requirements? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> *Michael Ridland | Technical Director | Xamarin MVP* >> >> XAM Consulting - Mobile Technology Specialists >> >> www.xam-consulting.com >> >> Blog: www.michaelridland.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com> >> wrote: >> >> Serious question – I have to look at this at work right now. We have >> SharePoint, but if there’s alternatives out there that people recommend >> (for a corporate environment), then I’d be keen to look into them >> >> >> >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: >> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *DotNet Dude >> *Sent:* Monday, 2 November 2015 12:57 PM >> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Office 365 >> >> >> >> Damn I've been busted.... ummmm... lotus notes >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com> >> wrote: >> >> What alternatives would you recommend? >> >> >> >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: >> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *DotNet Dude >> *Sent:* Sunday, 1 November 2015 7:04 PM >> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Office 365 >> >> >> >> People still use sharepoint? Lol >> >> On Sunday, 1 November 2015, Stephen Price <step...@perthprojects.com> >> wrote: >> >> Actually did some more reading and it looks like the business version >> gives you access to Lync (for business), Sharepoint and I think >> collaborative office editing. As well as the Home stuff. All of which I am >> not using so don't need. I think Office 365 Home is the way to go for me >> right now. >> >> >> >> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 at 15:32 DotNet Dude <adotnetd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >From what I've heard (which is very little) >> >> the business version gives you more control in the "dashboard" to >> customise stuff. I also don't think you're meant to use non-business >> versions for commercial use, whatever that means. 😉 >> >> >> On Sunday, 1 November 2015, Stephen Price <step...@perthprojects.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> >> >> I know a few here use Office 365 (from previous threads) and was >> wondering if anyone is using the Office 365 Business? Trying to work out >> what it gives you and so far it looks exactly the same as the Home version >> except its more expensive. Perhaps business support is the extra? >> >> >> >> I'm currently using the freebie given to me via my msdn account and its >> great. Its called Office 365 Developer Subscription. Its not documented >> anywhere that that is, but it says I'm using Office 365 Personal except I >> have +1 install (2 total) when compared with the real Office 365 Personal >> product. >> >> I have a few more machines than that, and have decided to drop Dropbox >> (its in the name... they have been telling to do it all along...) and make >> OneDrive my main cloud storage. So wanted a couple more installs (and >> figure if i'm not paying for Dropbox anymore that can pay for Office 365. >> >> >> >> Going to go with Office 365 Home, but curious what the Office 365 >> Business Premium gives you. They only compare it with the other Business >> products, can't find a Home vs Business comparison. Not one that spells it >> out... >> >> >> >> >> > >
