Your daughter has done well. As others have mentioned the states should
either be divided correctly or not at all imo. Also any chance of the
domain being oz.net? Anything else is uncool as far as I'm concerned.

On Monday, 10 April 2017, Stephen Price <step...@lythixdesigns.com> wrote:

> Passed feedback to Katie and here's what she came up with.
> Three versions, a dark, light and a banner version.
>
>
>
> I really love these ones, think she'd done a great job.
>
> cheers
> Stephen
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');> <
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');>> on
> behalf of David Connors <da...@connors.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','da...@connors.com');>>
> *Sent:* Monday, 10 April 2017 3:56:58 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: Logo for Ozdotnet
>
> I'd make the text the logo. Greg's SQL downunder logo is a good model ...
> http://www.sqldownunder.com/SQLDownUnderSquareLogo2.jpg
>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 at 17:49 Stephen Price <step...@lythixdesigns.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','step...@lythixdesigns.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I think it needs to be accurate and not confusing.
>>
>>
>> I'll get her to make it all on one line (with and without the .com on the
>> end).
>>
>> I like the .com as then it can be used as advertising. Can always have
>> two versions I guess. One with and one without the .com.
>>
>>
>> We also have ozdotnet.com.au and more recently ozdotnet.io. (because
>> some dumbarse thought that would be a much better domain name... sounds
>> geeky)
>>
>>
>> So far option 6 is winning.
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');> <
>> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');>> on
>> behalf of David Richards <ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com');>>
>> *Sent:* Monday, 10 April 2017 3:43:47 PM
>> *To:* ozDotNet
>> *Subject:* Re: Logo for Ozdotnet
>>
>> #6 is the best f those presented.  Some suggestions:
>> - I think "oz.net.com" is just unclear.
>> - We probably don't need the ".com" as part of a logo.  The actual
>> website can be additional text below the logo on any promotional material
>> rather than part of the logo.
>> - Did you try "ozdotnet" on a single line?
>>
>> David
>>
>> "If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes
>>  will fall like a house of cards... checkmate!"
>>  -Zapp Brannigan, Futurama
>>
>> On 10 April 2017 at 16:48, Ian Thomas <il.tho...@outlook.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','il.tho...@outlook.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> #2 – I like the demarcation of the states. Also, it looks OK in
>>> monochrome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian Thomas
>>>
>>> Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');> [mailto:
>>> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com');>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Stephen Price
>>> *Sent:* Monday, 10 April 2017 3:59 PM
>>> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com');>>
>>> *Subject:* Logo for Ozdotnet
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My daughter, Katie, has given me a few logo designs based on what I
>>> asked for.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Plan is to put this on the website/forum (if/when that goes up) and make
>>> stickers and tshirts available (probably RedBubble). Turn it into something
>>> people can promote and get a bit of new blood.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Feedback welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> p.s. personally I like 06, but have asked if she could have white text
>>> with a black outline (to make it easier to read). Also liked the OZ
>>> characters being slightly larger.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
> David Connors
> da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363
>

Reply via email to