Do you have a multi-server farm  running across a load balancer by any chance? 
If so, isolate to each WFE and narrow it down. I have seen this sort of quirky 
behaviour with corrupt or out of sync caches on WFE boxes.


From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Maxine Harwood
Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013 10:08 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Re: Help with troubleshooting

Uls viewer have the logs have the message about the missing field guid, but 
when u run it again, the message doesn't appear again... It's random when and 
where in the site collection it occurs.

Sent from Max's iPhone

On 21/02/2013, at 9:32 AM, Sezai Komur 
<sharepointse...@gmail.com<mailto:sharepointse...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What kinds of errors are you seeing in the ULS logs?
Have you tried using ULS Viewer to see the underlying error messages when the 
pages display errors?
http://archive.msdn.microsoft.com/ULSViewer/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=3308

Sezai.

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Chris Grist 
<chris.gr...@beachenergy.com.au<mailto:chris.gr...@beachenergy.com.au>> wrote:
Perhaps take a backup to your test environment and if the same thing appears, 
try running through the database maintenance tasks.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262731(v=office.14).aspx

-----Original Message-----
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com> 
[mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com>] On Behalf 
Of Maxine Harwood
Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013 9:54 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Re: Help with troubleshooting

I'm not sure where to look for this, the issue is affecting views on multiple 
lists/libraries, some with nintex workflow (no sharepoint workflow) and some 
without. Could this change on one list affect others?

Sent from Max's iPhone

On 21/02/2013, at 8:44 AM, Matthew Cosier 
<cos...@gmail.com<mailto:cos...@gmail.com>> wrote:

> Sometimes if you change a field from a single line of text to multiple lines 
> of text when a workflow is published, you can get that error.  Do you have 
> any of these? You can try changing the fields temporarily.
>
> Cheers,
> Matthew Cosier
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 21/02/2013, at 9:21 AM, Maxine Harwood 
> <maxinetechg...@gmail.com<mailto:maxinetechg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Any advice or tips would be appreciated! Getting to the end of my bag of 
>> tricks.
>>
>> We have had Sharepoint 2010 running and stable for 18 months. Late last 
>> week, we started having some random issues in our site collection that 
>> include
>> *  errors showing views and dvwp. Logs indicate that the site failed to 
>> cache the field {various GUIDs}, Refreshing the page (sometimes twice) and 
>> the view works again. The same view might open without error next time... 
>> There is no consistency on which views across the site will fail
>> * attempting to open the item menu results in a message stating that the 
>> item has been moved or deleted, refresh the page to try again. As above, 
>> refreshing 2-3 times and the item menu will open again.
>> * conditional nintex workflows running when the criteria hasn't been met
>>
>> Most significantly, there is no apparent similarities between where these 
>> occur, different lists, library's, different sites. Across the board issues.
>>
>> There were no scheduled server or application changes before the issue 
>> started.
>>
>> I have tried rebooting, and a Sharepoint repair. I only have the one site 
>> collection, but the central admin isn't experiencing any issues. I suspect 
>> it's an issue in the content database.
>>
>> As this is a production environment, that is still mostly functional (though 
>> through a few refreshes) I am planning a course of action to run over the 
>> weekend, I would appreciate any suggestions on what I could look at. I am 
>> considering exporting the content database, deleting it and then creating a 
>> new one before importing, thinking it might be an issue in the content DB. 
>> Running out of ideas....
>>
>> Thanks for your time....
>> Maxine
>>
>> Sent from Max's iPad
>> _______________________________________________
>> ozmoss mailing list
>> ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com>
>> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
> _______________________________________________
> ozmoss mailing list
> ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com>
> http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com>
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
___________________________________________________
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee.
This email and any attachments are confidential and may
contain legally privileged information or copyright material.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received
this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone on +61 8 8338
2833 or by return email and delete the original message. It is important to
check for viruses and defects before opening or using attachments. Beach Energy
Limited accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its 
attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or
 unauthorised access. Thank you.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com>
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com<mailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com>
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
_______________________________________________
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

Reply via email to