Not so "third": in 2006, 123 M users of which 77 M on broadband: 
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/download/2006/18threport-en.pdf .

(and that doesn't include us in Hong Kong...)

Enzo

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lemon Obrien 
  To: theory and practice of decentralized computer networks 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:03 AM
  Subject: RE: [p2p-hackers] Xunlei


  So google is moving to the third world by way of fast downloads for 
antiquated systems.


  Alex Pankratov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    Apparently the toolbar is already bundled with Download Accelerator 
    Plus. See a small insert on the left-hand side about half way down 
    the page - http://www.speedbit.com

    There's got to be a better reason for G wanting to buy Xunlei.

    Alex

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
    > Travis Kalanick
    > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 12:20 PM
    > To: 'theory and practice of decentralized computer networks'
    > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > Subject: RE: [p2p-hackers] Xunlei
    > 
    > Google would be interested in that if it meant that their toolbar was
    > bundled with every Xunlei client. I don't know Chinese, but 
    > did see the
    > Google Toolbar offered up with the Xunlei downloader:
    > 
    > http://my.xunlei.com/setup.htm
    > 
    > 
    > T
    > 
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
    > Tien Tuan Anh Dinh
    > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 10:53 AM
    > To: theory and practice of decentralized computer networks
    > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > Subject: Re: [p2p-hackers] Xunlei
    > 
    > David Barrett wrote:
    > > Wow, very interesting. I can see the value of downloading 
    > in parallel
    > from
    > > multiple mirrors (though I'm surprised that enough content is
    > "accidentally
    > > mirrored" on multiple webservers to make this feature 
    > valuable in the
    > > general case).
    > So it only works iff the downloaded file was duplicated on 
    > more than one
    > servers and someone else must have downloaded from some other 
    > servers ? I
    > can't find a reason why Google would be interested in that. 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > p2p-hackers mailing list
    > p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
    > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > p2p-hackers mailing list
    > p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
    > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

    _______________________________________________
    p2p-hackers mailing list
    p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
    http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers




  You don't get no juice unless you squeeze
  Lemon Obrien, the Third.

  http://www.tamago.us


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  p2p-hackers mailing list
  p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
  http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers

Reply via email to