On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Well, the only thing I see is my two display_targets patches breaking >> gettext strings : >> http://code.toofishes.net/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=dfae7bdd52476673424f8020befef166cf95f3fc >> "Targets:" -> "Targets (%d):" >> "Remove:" -> "Remove (%d):" > Ha, I hadn't even realized this. Oops. Can you mark your patches > [PATCH/3.2] or [PATCH/future] or something next time? I wanted to ask > you which patches were for what, but you were sleeping obviously. > >> http://code.toofishes.net/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=8877c88defdd9ea90bed9fb569addfa2b242a0f4 >> "\nDo you want to remove these packages?" -> "Do you want to remove >> these packages?" >> >> However, as you can see, these 3 changes can easily be replicated to >> every translations by anyone. >> If you also think these patches are a good idea for the 3.2 release, I >> can do the necessary translation changes. > > Is it worth it, or just wait for 3.2.1? Up to you, but if we want to > do this now I need someone else to write the patch. >
I didn't make a distinction because I considered the possibility of fixing all strings myself, they are not real strings change. But this is the case for all patches currently on my working branch. For example the makepkg Y/n is in the same situation. If it is applied, I can do the translation updates myself. I am also fine with delaying all this stuff for 3.2.1. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
