In data sabato 18 luglio 2009 12:25:19, Xavier ha scritto: > > Do you realize your patch is the first one Xilon submitted : > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-February/008198.html
No, I didn't know it, or better I didn't remember of it (and that was a long, long time ago, so I think it's quite understandable) > > Then Aaron made the suggestion to move xfercommand handling to pacman > frontend, and to use fetch callback to register it. > Why did you revert this change, why is it problematic for you? > And why didn't you say anything back then? It's not problematic, I tried to simplify the patch since Sebastian's one seemed not to get in for some reason. I'm completely ok both ways, I think it boils down to personal preferences, I only care about the damn fetch callback getting in. If you prefer having xfercommand handled that way, Sebastian's patch will work more than fine. -- ------------------- Dario Freddi KDE Developer GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
