I know that partience is a virtue so I can only hope my fin findings
won't disappoint though with B&W stuff? I've never been disappointed.
On 16/09/2016 5:21 AM, John Gurd wrote:
We will await your report with interest, Dane (smiles)
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane
Trethowan
Sent: 15 September 2016 19:21
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wireless headphones review: They sound better
than the original
I have the originals myself though one does have to wonder just how good they
are if they're selling for the same price as the originals which they are,
anyway I've made arrangements to go take a listen myself.
On 16/09/2016 3:16 AM, John Gurd wrote:
If these are as good as they claim, I'd be sorely tempted even though I've got
the original P7's already.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of
Dane Trethowan
Sent: 14 September 2016 18:56
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wireless headphones review: They
sound better than the original
I?ve owned an original Bowers And Wilkins P7 set for around 12 months now I
think it is.
Like you I would never claim that they?re the best cans around but I reckon
they?re damn good all the same so I?ll be making a point of going to my local
Hi-Fi store to give these babies a listen.
On 14 Sep 2016, at 11:46 PM, Mary Otten <maryot...@comcast.net> wrote:
Theo Nicolakis
**********
Those of a positive and enquiring frame of mind will leave the rest of the
halfwits in this world behind.
