chris clepper wrote: > I uncommented it which is the correct behavior compared to the original > recordQT object.
i don't know why it has been removed. however, why don't we just use a separate outlet (or a different message) to indicate the end of recording? i am not a very big fan of ambigous messages... mfgas.dr IOhannes btw: chris, could you please commit the rest of the min/max changes? _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
