Hmm, I think I should fix this... it adds an ugly layer of complication to the list object but I think it would be inconsistent simply to refuse to handle them. And yes, it's a bug that they currently just get passed through without making the necessary consistency checks.
cheers Miller On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:50:48PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hi, > > it would be cool if the various operations of list-abs could also be > made to work with pointers. However one important construct doesn't > work and sometimes even lets Pd crash): extending a list with a > pointer element using [list append]X[pointer] > > Attached patch illustrates what I mean: The example on the bottom > right doesn't work correctly. I wonder: is this even supposed to work? > > Ciao > -- > Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
