Hallo, Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote: > One thing that would be cool for us to come up with is some way to > abstract the core, and gui of abstractions separately in such a way that > they could be used in multiple different state saving/communication paradigms. > > For example, if I could make one abstraction for the s-abstractions collection > and then have the user be able to choose whether it: > 1. saves using sssad, has a GOP gui > 2. saves using memento, has a GOP gui > 3. integrates with netpd, has netpd style gui > > This could just be a pipe dream, but then again I could never have imagined > someone creating something as amazing as netpd or sssad in Pure Data alone.
This is not a pipe dream, if a pipe dream is, what I guess a pipe dream is. All that would be necessary are a clean and documented interfaces for the DSP abstractions. Things like state saving, GUIs or network control then could easily be built as wrapper abstractions. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list