On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:41:13PM -0400, Chris McCormick wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:18:05PM +0200, Derek Holzer wrote: > > This is fairly esoteric to me. Could you give a "real world" example of > > what such an object would be used for? What need does it fulfill in your > > own patching strategies? Why did you make it? > > I can't answer for matju, but it seems like this would be useful for > making sure your signal paths are connected and data is flowing in the > way that you expect. This should be obvious by reading the patch, but > in a very complicated patch it could be quicker to check with tracecall. > I think it would make it easier to fix bugs.
Whoops. "message paths" not "signal paths". Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
