I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
cheers Miller On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:37:10PM -0400, marius schebella wrote: > you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd > 0.40 or 0.41??? > frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some > days ago. > http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/attachment.txt > marius. > > Robert Scott wrote: > > On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote: > >> you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location > >> you want to send to: > >> [;receiver1 123( > >> > >> or with variables: > >> > >> [receiver1 123( > >> > >> [;$1 $2( > >> > >> that will send 123 to "receiver1". > >> marius. > > > > I'd never thought to use a $ as the object selector there - maybe I should > > go > > to bed earlier - thankyou marius. > > > > One issue though. > > > > I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and the > > positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this. > > > > > > robert. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list