> That's too bad. I'll take your word for it that jackdmp wouldn't be > able to manage the inter-process connection in a scalable way -- I'm not > familiar with how it works. I'm disappointed, because it sounded like a > cheap (and yes, slightly inconvenient -- but better than nothing) way to > scale up PD with SMP.
if you can split your pd patches to a small number of instances (say 10), you'd probably have some benefit ... running 50 instances of pd is probably not a good idea ... cheers, tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://tim.klingt.org The price an artist pays for doing what he wants is that he has to do it. William S. Burroughs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
