On Sep 24, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Jamie Bullock wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 05:31 +0100, Andy Farnell wrote: >> >> OLP*C* - for a child there is no doubt, Pd is vastly easier >> to understand and use than Csound. > > I had a play with one of the OLPC machines at GUADEC this year, and > Csound is well buried beneath a polished GUI. I presume they chose it > because of the all the built-in and instantly usable opcodes/ugens.
The OLPC music app I saw was this little sequencer. I was appalled to see that it was really heavy on the western music system, with seemingly little option for anything else. So much for the laptop for the world... or hopefully I am wrong. .hc > > Jamie > > -- > www.postlude.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
