You can do it combining bang~ with sub-64-sample message delays. cheers M
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:05:46PM -0400, marius schebella wrote: > hi, > is there an alternative for bang~ that will work with blocksizes smaller > than 64 samples? > or is there a chance to fix bang~? > marius. > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
