honestly, I think not many people used it... I ran grep -R " pow~" * in my pd-directories and found only two patches (of 10000+) besides the helppatch for pow~, that use it. nusmuk for distortion.pd, tb for sigmoid_booster~.pd I don't know other big collections like net-pd (I think I just checked pdmtl). and maybe "official" tutorial patches floating around.
anyway, I can only speak for myself, and I would like to see "pow~" with a new behaviour. marius. Andy Farnell wrote: > Yes, a backwards clash is horrible Marius, and I want to avoid that > too. > > The question would be over a new name I guess. > > There's plenty of room in the name space to avoid clashing if > we do reverse [pow~] > > [pwr~] for eample (anyone building a pressurised water reactor?...) > > It may seem weird to fuss over a few characters but I would > choose [**~] or [pwr~] over [power~] simply for that tiny bit > of diagram space. > > a. > > On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:59:08 -0400 > marius schebella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> counter, which are the real troublemakes regarding backwards >> compatibility and shareability. >> marius. > > _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list