IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > but of course you proposal to use another source for synching the > outputs is the way to go.
yeah, i kind of realised this one as well... hm. are all the [~] objects going to trigger before or after all the message-rate objects? is that much defined? or could there be interleaved [~] and message-rate object firings? eg an [env~] fires before a [* ] which is then followed by another [env~]? d -- damian stewart | skype: damiansnz | [EMAIL PROTECTED] frey | live art with machines | http://www.frey.co.nz _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list