On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 18:34 +0000, Florian Hollerweger wrote: > >> i never understood, why [timer] is giving different values from the ones > >> that you expected, when connected to a [bang~] inside a re-blocked > >> subpatch. would be cool to have that either explained or declared as a > >> bug. > > Sorry, Roman - could you clarify which blocksizes you are talking about? > What Peter and I have observed is that block sizes < 64 give the same > [timer] results as a block size of 64, so there seems to be a lower > limit. I am not sure though whether you are you talking about the same > phenomenon?
yo, this is what i was talking about. in a subpatch with a lower blocksize than 64, [bang~] still outputs a bang only every 64 samples. roman ___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list