Am 22.06.2009 um 08:56 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
Max wrote:great. now i get iohannes' irony.
it really wasn't irony (but of course it only makes sense if you knew that [pix_buffer_filmopen] is implemented as an abstraction): if you do have a modified patch of pix_buffer_filmopen and want it to be included into upcoming releases, please post it to the patch- tracker at http://sf.net/prjects/pd-gem
IOhannes, i'm deeply flattered to be able to contribute. you'll find the patches in the tracker.
max
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
