Hi,
> Well, if you use [tabread4~] or any of the many other Pd objects
> that use the same broken interpolation algorithm
> (copy/paste programming),
Broken? What's wrong in the tabread4~ interpolation? (note this is not a
sarchastical question implying there's nothing wrong in it, it's a
genuine question in order to learn what's wrong in it)
Is it a bug?
Claude wrote:
> If you use [tabread4] to interpolate graphical
> parameters for animations, the discontinuities in the derivatives are
> really obvious.
[....]
> But IMHO if you're doing piecewise cubic interpolation, it's a bit
> of a nonsense to have a cubic that goes through all 4 points when
> it's only being used between the inner-most 2 points
Well using 4 points to interpolate the curve that goes between the two
inner points should guarantee the absence of discontinuities in the
first (and second?) derivative; that should be the purpose. Now if there
actually are discontinuities then there must be some trivial error in
the equation, no????
Or am I missing something???
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
matteosistise...@gmail.com
http://www.matteosistisette.com
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
