Am 14.07.2010 um 19:25 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig: > On 2010-07-14 19:21, Max wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> in a Gem patch i use pix_motionblur and pix_buffer and after some time with >> the pix_motionblur added i can't get rid of it any more. Setting the blur to >> 0 to the right inlet or switching the motionblur off by sending a 0 to the >> left inlet doesn't take the blur away any more. only re-loading the videos >> to the buffer makes the image unblurred again. >> It seems like pix_motionblur alters the images which are stored in the >> buffer. >> Sorry i can't provide a simple patch demonstrating the problem right now, >> but maybe even this rudimentary description is enough to give me a clue what >> the reason for this behavior could be. >> > yes, Gem does most of it's operations "in-place", thus modifying the > incoming image rather than generating a copy. this is all for cache reasons. > if it's important for you to preserve the original image, use > [pix_separator] to force making a copy before mixing the pixes.
when i place pix_separator in between pix_buffer_read and pix_motionblur it eats a lot of cpu, but there is no more motionblur. if i place it anywhere else in the gem chain there is motionblur, but then it doesn't go away any more when set to 0. i'll try to come up with a patch to demonstrate the problem. m.
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
