2011/1/11 Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Ludwig Maes wrote: > > I always felt message passing was unnecessarily expensive but I didnt >> realise message passing was that expensive! I seriously think it would be >> good to have a pd front end for gcc, a few of us should take the time to >> learn GIMPLE and implement a "compile" menu item to compile >> patches/subpatches. >> > > There are a lot of possible ways to compile patches without having to deal > with machine code generation and use. I'm sure you can triple the speed of a > lot of patches in this manner, and I wouldn't be surprised to get tenfold > improvements in some cases. > > That sounds too cool! Is there a way which includes graphical objects as well?
Andras > OTOH, another way to deal with a slow interpreter, is to pass fewer, bigger > messages, to objects that do more work at once. This is much of the original > idea for creating GridFlow. > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
