On 11/11/2011 01:18 AM, tim vets wrote: > > it was just a thought, I can imagine if you would have based some > sophisticated sample playback on a whole bunch of tabplay~'s or readsf~'s, > that maybe you wouldn't want or have time to change all that... > I checked [switch~] again and indeed you can enter 0.5 to downsample by > factor 2, does that mean you could enter 0.91875000000000007 to downsample > from 48 to 44.1?
no. you can only enter power-of-2 numbers, e.g. 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 in my other mail i mentioned that it is hard to do "proper" resampling, i meant that it is hard to do resampling without getting hearable artefacts. the 2nd thing that prohibits resampling by an arbitrary amount (as opposed to the power-of-2 resampling that is already there) is, that Pd is not really multi-rate capable. it's obviously quite trivial to reblock a 64 sample block into 128 samples (you just emit a block every other input block), but things get a bit hairy when you want to reblock to 77 while caring for speed. fmgasdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
