On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, katja <katjavet...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... >> On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 11:56 +0100, katja wrote: >>> Cool, with [nbuntil] the workload is even spread over the cores! >> >> I don't think that [nbuntil] will help in making Pd use more than one >> core. Since [nbuntil] is just an abstraction, everything run "below" it >> is still part of the pd process/thread. For fully exploiting many cores, >> real threading is needed, I suppose. > > You're right, your abstraction exploits threading which is already > done. When running [nbuntil-help] on OSX, I notice CPU increase for > both cores in Activity Monitor. But it is also the case with regular > [until] in the patch.
Wait this is not a matter of threading of course, the process is just switching between cores. Katja _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
