On Die, 2013-01-22 at 21:09 +0000, Pagano, Patrick wrote:
> Not Sure that one will not loop properly because of the need for an open
> message each time.
You are indeed right. It is not the proper way to do it. Even the
help-file of [readsf~] states it. However, in practice it usually works
flawlessly (probably nowadays disks seem fast enough and there is enough
memory for fs caches). Simply try it with the help of [readsf~ ].
Also the table based approach works, though I'd make two modifications
to the previously posted patch. Use the '-maxsize ' flag for the message
to [soundfiler] in order to allow bigger tables. Then, I'd get rid of
[tabread4~], as it is not needed when you only want to play at original
speed. Actually, I even wouldn't use [tabread~ ], because for very large
tables, the index from [phasor~ ] or [line~ ] will not be precise enough
to hit every sample after position 16'000'000 (limit of the 32bit
floating point format). If you use [tabplay~], it is as simple my
previous example with [readsf~ ]:
[r playagain]
|
[tabplay yourpreviouslyfilledtable]
|
[s playagain]
IIRC, [tabplay~] doesn't suffer from that precision problem described
before.
Roman
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of
> Roman Haefeli
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:04 PM
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] Simplest way for looping soudfiles
>
>
>
> On Die, 2013-01-22 at 20:50 +0000, Pagano, Patrick wrote:
> > Can people share their opinions on the simplest way to create
> > a looping soundfile.
>
> [r playagain]
> |
> [open /path/to/your/file.wav, 1(
> |
> [readsf~ ]
> |
> [s playagain]
>
>
> Roman
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
