On 03/10/2014 12:56 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 03/10/2014 05:38 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Additionally, IOhannes also knows that Miller wants the [initbang]
functionality in the form of a backwards-compatible [loadbang] which takes
arguments.
[...]
thanks for the insights.
i didn't know that i knew *that*. i would therefore be interested how i
could have known it.
Sorry, I assumed you read the relevant publicly available thread that
has messages you authored weaving through it:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.devel/8611
That's from 2010. For a patch you submitted in 2006.
We're currently in 2014.
That such a feature would take nearly a decade to get into the professed
"core" (and still isn't included, in any form) is a symptom of an
unhealthy development process. An unhealthy development process keeps
potential developers from participating and improving the software,
which is a vicious cycle.
-Jonathan
vcmr
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
